Comparison Overview

Hyundai Motor Company

VS

DENSO

Hyundai Motor Company

231, Yangjae-Dong, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, KR, 137-938
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Our mission is clear: to become a lifelong mobility partner for our customers and communities by creating meaningful progress through clean energy, connected technology, and human-centered innovation. Hyundai Motor Company is a global mobility leader committed to shaping a better future. With more than 120,000 employees across 200+ countries, we are redefining the way the world moves, not just through innovation in automotive design, but through bold investments in smart mobility, sustainability, and technology. Each year, we bring over 4.6 million vehicles to drivers around the globe – from award-winning sedans to cutting-edge electric and hydrogen-powered solutions.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 58,518
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

DENSO

24777 Denso Dr, Southfield, Michigan, US, 48033
Last Update: 2025-11-24

DENSO is one of the world's largest automotive suppliers with a 75-year history of providing advanced automotive systems and technology to automakers worldwide. While our products are featured on nearly every vehicle make and model on the road today, we're also looking to innovate beyond automotive so we can maximize how we support the evolving needs of society. Globally, we have 158,000 employees, including 27,000+ in North America, working together every day to pursue our Two Great Causes: Green -- which represents our goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2035 through our products, processes and facilities; and Peace of Mind -- which focuses on developing solutions for safer and more seamless experiences across society. Together, they help us pursue our mission of contributing to a better world.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 17,533
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hyundai-motor-company.jpeg
Hyundai Motor Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denso.jpeg
DENSO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hyundai Motor Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DENSO
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hyundai Motor Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DENSO in 2025.

Incident History — Hyundai Motor Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hyundai Motor Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DENSO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DENSO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hyundai-motor-company.jpeg
Hyundai Motor Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denso.jpeg
DENSO
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data theft and ransom
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Hyundai Motor Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DENSO company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hyundai Motor Company and DENSO have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, DENSO company and Hyundai Motor Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

DENSO company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Hyundai Motor Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Hyundai Motor Company company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other DENSO company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DENSO company nor Hyundai Motor Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hyundai Motor Company company nor DENSO company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hyundai Motor Company nor DENSO holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hyundai Motor Company company nor DENSO company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hyundai Motor Company company employs more people globally than DENSO company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Hyundai Motor Company nor DENSO holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hyundai Motor Company nor DENSO holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hyundai Motor Company nor DENSO holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hyundai Motor Company nor DENSO holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hyundai Motor Company nor DENSO holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hyundai Motor Company nor DENSO holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H