Comparison Overview

Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP

VS

Odell Girton Siegel, LLC

Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP

6000 Sagemore Drive, Suite 6301, Marlton, NJ, US, 08053
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Hyland Levin LLP was founded in 2009 by a group of 11 attorneys who made the collective commitment to focus exclusively on the practice of law, without being distracted by a lot of red tape often associated with large law firm practice. Comprised largely of business and transactional, real estate and land use attorneys, making the successful move to open a new firm in one of the most difficult economic environments has been praised as both smart and gutsy by clients and colleagues alike. The core strengths of Hyland Levin lie in the experience, reputation, relationships, work ethic and the character of the firm's attorneys and staff. Each and every person believes in the philosophy that the client comes first and swift, effective, results-driven service is more than a goal. It's a standard of practice. Hyland Levin attorneys concentrate their practices in the areas of business and transactions, real estate, land use, leasing, environmental law, general and commercial litigation, franchise and distribution, immigration, liquor license regulation, tax and estate planning, business planning and real property tax appeals.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Odell Girton Siegel, LLC

373 Park Avenue South, New York, New York, NY, 10016, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

In order to thrive, a modern business needs to be visionary, streamlined, and market-driven — and their law firm should be held to the same standard. We built OGS to advise companies obsessed with creating value at each stage of their development, and we do it with a unique blend of experience, commercial-mindedness and ingenuity. We’re partners in your growth.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hyland-levin-llp.jpeg
Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gs-law-partners-llc.jpeg
Odell Girton Siegel, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Odell Girton Siegel, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Odell Girton Siegel, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Odell Girton Siegel, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Odell Girton Siegel, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hyland-levin-llp.jpeg
Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gs-law-partners-llc.jpeg
Odell Girton Siegel, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Odell Girton Siegel, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Odell Girton Siegel, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP company.

In the current year, Odell Girton Siegel, LLC company and Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Odell Girton Siegel, LLC company nor Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Odell Girton Siegel, LLC company nor Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Odell Girton Siegel, LLC company nor Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP company nor Odell Girton Siegel, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP nor Odell Girton Siegel, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP company nor Odell Girton Siegel, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP company employs more people globally than Odell Girton Siegel, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP nor Odell Girton Siegel, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP nor Odell Girton Siegel, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP nor Odell Girton Siegel, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP nor Odell Girton Siegel, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP nor Odell Girton Siegel, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hyland Levin Shapiro LLP nor Odell Girton Siegel, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X