Comparison Overview

Hydraulic Controls, Inc.

VS

GPA

Hydraulic Controls, Inc.

4700 San Pablo Avenue, Emeryville, California, 94608, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24

Hydraulic Controls, Inc has been a premier fluid power distributor in the Pacific Southwest for over 50 years. As such, we are known and trusted by our customers, with many of whom our relationships go back decades. We have 14 employee-owned branches located throughout California, Utah, Arizona, Colorado and Idaho. Hydraulic Controls Inc has multiple certified fluid power hydraulic specialists on staff as well as experienced repair technicians. Each facility keeps an inventory suited to the local market, whether it is custom harvesting equipment for California agriculture, oil drilling in Colorado, mining in Utah and Arizona, or industrial applications in major metropolitan areas. As an employee-owned company, HCI is dedicated to maintaining highly ethical business relationships with our staff, customers and suppliers. We look forward to serving you.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GPA

501 Covil Ave, Wilmington, 28403, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Global Process Automation™ (GPA) is a full-service industrial technology solutions provider specializing in Discrete & Process Automation, OT Infrastructure & ICS Cybersecurity, and Manufacturing Intelligence. Our vision is to leverage our expertise to build meaningful relationships with our customers while guiding them toward industrial plant digitization, IT/OT convergence, and innovations to come. Since 1996, GPA has been a trusted partner in delivering specialized solutions that drive efficiency, security, and innovation across the manufacturing sector. With decades of experience and a cross-functional team of experts, we help manufacturers of all sizes modernize their operations—whether through automating complex processes, securing critical infrastructure, or turning data into actionable insights. Our Customer Success department plays a pivotal role in ensuring long-term value for every client engagement. Guided by our Plan, Build, Run methodology, we partner closely with customers at every stage of their digital journey—from initial strategy and implementation to ongoing optimization and support. Our customer-centric approach ensures that each solution is designed with your unique goals in mind, providing scalable technologies and long-term support that evolve with your business. From plant floor to digitization, GPA is committed to helping you navigate the future of smart manufacturing with confidence.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 90
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hydrauliccontrolsinc.jpeg
Hydraulic Controls, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-process-automation.jpeg
GPA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hydraulic Controls, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GPA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hydraulic Controls, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GPA in 2025.

Incident History — Hydraulic Controls, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hydraulic Controls, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hydrauliccontrolsinc.jpeg
Hydraulic Controls, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-process-automation.jpeg
GPA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hydraulic Controls, Inc. company and GPA company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, GPA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hydraulic Controls, Inc. company.

In the current year, GPA company and Hydraulic Controls, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GPA company nor Hydraulic Controls, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GPA company nor Hydraulic Controls, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GPA company nor Hydraulic Controls, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hydraulic Controls, Inc. company nor GPA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hydraulic Controls, Inc. nor GPA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hydraulic Controls, Inc. company nor GPA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hydraulic Controls, Inc. company employs more people globally than GPA company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Hydraulic Controls, Inc. nor GPA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hydraulic Controls, Inc. nor GPA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hydraulic Controls, Inc. nor GPA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hydraulic Controls, Inc. nor GPA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hydraulic Controls, Inc. nor GPA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hydraulic Controls, Inc. nor GPA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H