Comparison Overview

Hydrac Sa Cameroun

VS

Center for American Progress

Hydrac Sa Cameroun

Siège Social 935 route du Centre Industriel 3W 830 BASSA , B.P. 12806 Douala, Cameroun, Douala, Littoral, B.P. 12806 Douala, Cameroun, CM
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

La Société Hydrocarbures-Analyses-Contrôles (HYDRAC), filiale de la société nationale des hydrocarbures (SNH) a été créée le 18 janvier 1982. A sa création, elle avait pour mission la sauvegarde des intérêts du Cameroun dans toutes les transactions pétrolières, à travers le contrôle et la certification des quantités et de la qualité des pétroles bruts, produits pétroliers et dérivés. S’appuyant sur l’expérience acquise dans ce domaine et à la demande des opérateurs industriels, HYDRAC a élargi ses domaines de compétence et a fait de l’inspection son métier. Avec un effectif de 119 employés (48 cadres, 45 agents de maîtrises et 26 agents), depuis 2013 , une Filiale à N’djamena, HYDRAC TCHAD est ouvert.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 127
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for American Progress

1333 H St., Washington, DC, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Center for American Progress is a think tank dedicated to improving the lives of Americans through ideas and action. We combine bold policy ideas with a modern communications platform to help shape the national debate, expose the hollowness of conservative governing philosophy, and challenge the media to cover the issues that truly matter. Our work builds upon progressive ideals put forth by such leaders as Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, JFK, and Martin Luther King. We draw from the great social movements of the 20th century—from labor rights and worker safety, to civil rights and women's suffrage. We translate those values into new ideas and action firmly rooted in the economic and political realities of the 21st century.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 383
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hydrac-sa.jpeg
Hydrac Sa Cameroun
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-american-progress.jpeg
Center for American Progress
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hydrac Sa Cameroun
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for American Progress
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hydrac Sa Cameroun in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for American Progress in 2025.

Incident History — Hydrac Sa Cameroun (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hydrac Sa Cameroun cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for American Progress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for American Progress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hydrac-sa.jpeg
Hydrac Sa Cameroun
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-american-progress.jpeg
Center for American Progress
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for American Progress company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hydrac Sa Cameroun company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for American Progress company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hydrac Sa Cameroun company.

In the current year, Center for American Progress company and Hydrac Sa Cameroun company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for American Progress company nor Hydrac Sa Cameroun company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for American Progress company nor Hydrac Sa Cameroun company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for American Progress company nor Hydrac Sa Cameroun company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hydrac Sa Cameroun company nor Center for American Progress company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hydrac Sa Cameroun nor Center for American Progress holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hydrac Sa Cameroun company nor Center for American Progress company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for American Progress company employs more people globally than Hydrac Sa Cameroun company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Hydrac Sa Cameroun nor Center for American Progress holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hydrac Sa Cameroun nor Center for American Progress holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hydrac Sa Cameroun nor Center for American Progress holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hydrac Sa Cameroun nor Center for American Progress holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hydrac Sa Cameroun nor Center for American Progress holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hydrac Sa Cameroun nor Center for American Progress holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X