Comparison Overview

Hyde Park Label

VS

Screaming Images

Hyde Park Label

4031 Guadalupe, Austin, TX, 78751, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hydeparklabel.com

Austin’s premier label printing company For more than 25 years, Hyde Park Label has been serving businesses in central Texas and throughout the country. Our friendly professionals in sales, graphic design, prepress and printing offer expert advice and the highest quality original graphic design to help you create the best possible label. From 1-color to 8-color labels, Hyde Park Label gives you the best quality, reduced cost and efficiency combined with the friendliest, most knowledgeable service in the industry. Guaranteed. Call us today at 1-800-290-8580.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Screaming Images

6975 S Decatur Blvd., Las Vegas, NV, 89118, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.screamingimages.net

For more than a 15 years, Screaming Images has served as your one-stop-shop for grand format printing an installation. While based in Las Vegas, we work with clients from all over the United States and with everyone from sports stadiums, to bands, concert venues, hotel resorts and more. If it’s an attention-grabbing visual you’re looking for, we can make it happen. We love getting to work with our clients from concept to creation and installation and disrupt the status quo with some amazing imagery. Screaming Images started out as a graphics design company and through the years we’ve added on to our services, giving us the ability to work with our clients from design to implementation. We’ve continued to evolve and now offer a variety of Share Shields, for when social distancing isn’t an option at a time when health and safety is most important. We have your solutions on your business’s PPE from gaming to live entertainment and more. Whether it’s printing and installation, a Share-Shield or something you have yet to think of, but know you need, we’re here for you. Contact us today at [email protected].

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hyde-park-label.jpeg
Hyde Park Label
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/screaming-images.jpeg
Screaming Images
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hyde Park Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Screaming Images
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hyde Park Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Screaming Images in 2025.

Incident History — Hyde Park Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hyde Park Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Screaming Images (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Screaming Images cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hyde-park-label.jpeg
Hyde Park Label
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/screaming-images.jpeg
Screaming Images
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hyde Park Label company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Screaming Images company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Screaming Images company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hyde Park Label company.

In the current year, Screaming Images company and Hyde Park Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Screaming Images company nor Hyde Park Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Screaming Images company nor Hyde Park Label company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Screaming Images company nor Hyde Park Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hyde Park Label company nor Screaming Images company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hyde Park Label nor Screaming Images holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hyde Park Label company nor Screaming Images company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Screaming Images company employs more people globally than Hyde Park Label company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Hyde Park Label nor Screaming Images holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hyde Park Label nor Screaming Images holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hyde Park Label nor Screaming Images holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hyde Park Label nor Screaming Images holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hyde Park Label nor Screaming Images holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hyde Park Label nor Screaming Images holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References