Comparison Overview

Hutchinson

VS

Scania Group

Hutchinson

2, Rue de Balzac, Paris, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hutchinson.com

Hutchinson designs and produces customized materials and connected solutions to respond to the needs of its global customers, on land, in the air and at sea. A global leader in vibration control, fluid management and sealing system technologies, our Group stands out with a multiple market offering spanning multiple areas of expertise and delivering synergies and value-added. Hutchinson reported revenues of €5 billion in 2024 and has more than 40,000 employees in 25 countries. Our ambition is to contribute to safer, more comfortable and more responsible mobility for the future.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 12,282
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Scania Group

Vagnmakarvägen 1, Södertälje, SE, SE-151 87
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.scania.com/group/en/

Scania is a world-leading provider of transport solutions committed to a better tomorrow. Our purpose is to drive the shift towards a sustainable transport system. In doing so, we are creating a world of mobility that’s better for business, society and our environment. Employing more than 50,000 people in about 100 countries, Scania’s research and development is concentrated in Sweden, while production takes place in Europe and South America.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 30,301
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hutchinson.jpeg
Hutchinson
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scania.jpeg
Scania Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hutchinson
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scania Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hutchinson in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Scania Group has 66.67% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Hutchinson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hutchinson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scania Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scania Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hutchinson.jpeg
Hutchinson
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scania.jpeg
Scania Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Hutchinson company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Scania Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Scania Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Hutchinson company has not reported any.

In the current year, Scania Group company has reported more cyber incidents than Hutchinson company.

Neither Scania Group company nor Hutchinson company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Scania Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Hutchinson company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Scania Group company nor Hutchinson company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hutchinson company nor Scania Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hutchinson nor Scania Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Scania Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hutchinson company.

Scania Group company employs more people globally than Hutchinson company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Hutchinson nor Scania Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hutchinson nor Scania Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hutchinson nor Scania Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hutchinson nor Scania Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hutchinson nor Scania Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hutchinson nor Scania Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References