Comparison Overview

Hunter Pumps

VS

Giering Metal Finishing Inc

Hunter Pumps

37 Huntingdale Dr, Thornton, New South Wales, 2322, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Hunter Pumps was established in 1995 to provide pumping solutions to the Commercial, Industrial, Mining and Civil sectors. Hunter Pumps have established a broad client base through competitively offering the best equipment on time and to specification, servicing Australia wide and New Zealand. We offer design, supply AND install. We can offer the most comprehensive range of pump types and brands as we are not tied to a single brand. We work closely with Clients, their Engineers and Contractors to provide the optimal solution. Whether that be selection “off the shelf” or units specifically designed and assembled in our workshops, we will reliably deliver on cost, on time, to specification. Any questions or queries, feel free to contact us via LinkedIn or on 02 4958 7555.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Giering Metal Finishing Inc

None
Last Update:

Giering Metal Finishing, Inc. is a three-generation family business of coating experts, providing world-class metal finishing services to manufacturing companies throughout the United States and beyond. Our coatings provide corrosion protection and aesthetic beauty to products around the globe. Our business thrives on solving challenging jobs where other finishers struggle. We stay ahead of our competition by continually investing back into our finishing technologies, our manufacturing facilities and our workforce. Our unwavering mission is to create value for our customers based on the foundation of trust, honesty and customer service. We operate predictability by monitoring and measuring all aspects of our manufacturing procedures. We estimate jobs transparently, and our pricing is competitive, but we never compromise quality. We have built our accountable reputation on reliable quality and delivery, earning us loyal, repeat customers. Our partnerships help design best suitable finishes for applications, support today’s supply chain challenges, solve coating issues, and sustain finishing requirements for our customers’. Our sharp competitive edge establishes us in the finishing industry, making us the company we are today.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hunter-pumps-sales-&-service.jpeg
Hunter Pumps
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/giering-metal-finishing-inc.jpeg
Giering Metal Finishing Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hunter Pumps
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Giering Metal Finishing Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hunter Pumps in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Giering Metal Finishing Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Hunter Pumps (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hunter Pumps cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Giering Metal Finishing Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Giering Metal Finishing Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hunter-pumps-sales-&-service.jpeg
Hunter Pumps
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/giering-metal-finishing-inc.jpeg
Giering Metal Finishing Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Giering Metal Finishing Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hunter Pumps company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Giering Metal Finishing Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hunter Pumps company.

In the current year, Giering Metal Finishing Inc company and Hunter Pumps company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Giering Metal Finishing Inc company nor Hunter Pumps company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Giering Metal Finishing Inc company nor Hunter Pumps company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Giering Metal Finishing Inc company nor Hunter Pumps company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hunter Pumps company nor Giering Metal Finishing Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hunter Pumps nor Giering Metal Finishing Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hunter Pumps company nor Giering Metal Finishing Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Giering Metal Finishing Inc company employs more people globally than Hunter Pumps company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Hunter Pumps nor Giering Metal Finishing Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hunter Pumps nor Giering Metal Finishing Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hunter Pumps nor Giering Metal Finishing Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hunter Pumps nor Giering Metal Finishing Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hunter Pumps nor Giering Metal Finishing Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hunter Pumps nor Giering Metal Finishing Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H