Comparison Overview

Hunter Museum of American Art

VS

Lone Star Flight Museum

Hunter Museum of American Art

10 Bluff View, Chattanooga, TN, 37415, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Hunter Museum focuses on American art from the Colonial period to the present day. The variety of the collection inside is reflected by the architecture of the museum's exterior. The museum is housed in an early twentieth century mansion, a modern 1970s era building and a sleek, contemporary structure of steel and glass. The museum's collection includes paintings, works on paper, sculpture, furniture and contemporary studio glass covering a diverse range of styles and periods. The Hunter Museum is a 501 (C) 3 Non-Profit charitable institution.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lone Star Flight Museum

11551 Aerospace Avenue, Houston, Texas, 77034, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Lone Star Flight Museum's (LSFM) mission is to celebrate flight and achievement in Texas aviation history; and educate and engage our youth through Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM). Lead by Anna Hawley, LSFM opened its $38 million state-of-the-art museum on Labor Day weekend 2017 at Ellington Field in Houston, TX. Founded in 1985, the 130,000 square foot museum includes the Texas Aviation Hall of Fame, historic aircraft and period artifacts, and a $1 million Aviation Learning Center featuring simulator-based STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) curriculum, that provides a hands-on, interactive learning environment to inspire and educate students. LSFM’s vision is to be a world-class educational museum linking an understanding of the past with inspiration for the future.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hunter-museum-of-american-art.jpeg
Hunter Museum of American Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lone-star-flight-museum.jpeg
Lone Star Flight Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hunter Museum of American Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lone Star Flight Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hunter Museum of American Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lone Star Flight Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Hunter Museum of American Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hunter Museum of American Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lone Star Flight Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lone Star Flight Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hunter-museum-of-american-art.jpeg
Hunter Museum of American Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lone-star-flight-museum.jpeg
Lone Star Flight Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hunter Museum of American Art company and Lone Star Flight Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Lone Star Flight Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hunter Museum of American Art company.

In the current year, Lone Star Flight Museum company and Hunter Museum of American Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lone Star Flight Museum company nor Hunter Museum of American Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lone Star Flight Museum company nor Hunter Museum of American Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lone Star Flight Museum company nor Hunter Museum of American Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hunter Museum of American Art company nor Lone Star Flight Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hunter Museum of American Art nor Lone Star Flight Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hunter Museum of American Art company nor Lone Star Flight Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hunter Museum of American Art company employs more people globally than Lone Star Flight Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Hunter Museum of American Art nor Lone Star Flight Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hunter Museum of American Art nor Lone Star Flight Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hunter Museum of American Art nor Lone Star Flight Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hunter Museum of American Art nor Lone Star Flight Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hunter Museum of American Art nor Lone Star Flight Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hunter Museum of American Art nor Lone Star Flight Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X