Comparison Overview

Hunt Automotive Electronics

VS

INSYS icom

Hunt Automotive Electronics

48089, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.hunt-radio.com

• Originally was involved in installation of three Dell 4600 servers with PERC 3/Di controllers running Windows 2000 server. Having since migrated to Windows 2003 SBS. Network consists of 3 Dell 4600 servers: exchange server, file - print server/DHCP/Active Directory, and Application server w/ Microsoft SQL server 2005. All servers running windows 2003 SBS. Installed and configured networked copying machines/printers. LAN has 50 clients with Windows XP professional. • Responsible for tape back-ups using Symantec Netbackup and maintaining processes for minimal downtime. This includes raid5 disk arrays for fault tolerance and ghosting client machines. My duties also included the creation and deletion of user accounts and GPO’s. Developed security schema for all servers and client machines. This included all account policies- password lockout settings, password complexity, and security templates for all

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

INSYS icom

Hermann-Köhl-Str. 22,, Regensburg, Bavaria, DE, 93049
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.insys-icom.com

Secure communication and networking of data in industrial applications - this is the core competence of INSYS icom. With our intelligent and powerful hardware and software solutions (Managed Devices and Services), machines, plants and other devices can be reached remotely and their operating data transmitted. With its expert knowledge of this complex subject area, INSYS icom is mastering the advancing digitalization. The company has set itself the goal of continuously developing innovations for industrial data communication and networking and works passionately every day to achieve this. The leading manufacturer in the energy and water supply segment also positions itself as a premium partner in the field of mechanical engineering. Customer proximity in all its forms is the foundation for the regionally rooted and cosmopolitan company. Imprint: https://www.insys-icom.com/en/imprint/ Data Protection Policy: https://www.insys-icom.com/en/data-protection-policy/

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Hunt Automotive Electronics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insys-icom.jpeg
INSYS icom
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hunt Automotive Electronics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
INSYS icom
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hunt Automotive Electronics in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INSYS icom in 2025.

Incident History — Hunt Automotive Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hunt Automotive Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — INSYS icom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INSYS icom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Hunt Automotive Electronics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insys-icom.jpeg
INSYS icom
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hunt Automotive Electronics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to INSYS icom company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, INSYS icom company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hunt Automotive Electronics company.

In the current year, INSYS icom company and Hunt Automotive Electronics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither INSYS icom company nor Hunt Automotive Electronics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither INSYS icom company nor Hunt Automotive Electronics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither INSYS icom company nor Hunt Automotive Electronics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hunt Automotive Electronics company nor INSYS icom company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hunt Automotive Electronics nor INSYS icom holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hunt Automotive Electronics company nor INSYS icom company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

INSYS icom company employs more people globally than Hunt Automotive Electronics company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Hunt Automotive Electronics nor INSYS icom holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hunt Automotive Electronics nor INSYS icom holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hunt Automotive Electronics nor INSYS icom holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hunt Automotive Electronics nor INSYS icom holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hunt Automotive Electronics nor INSYS icom holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hunt Automotive Electronics nor INSYS icom holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References