Comparison Overview

Hume Media Inc.

VS

Signs.com

Hume Media Inc.

66 & 70 Crockford Blvd., Toronto, ON, M1R 3C3, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Opened in 1988, Hume was a leader at the forefront of the digital print revolution and is recognized today as one of the largest and most advanced digital printers in Canada. Hume is a full-service media company providing unparalleled one-on-one customer service in print, design, web hosting, web-to-print, video, online ordering, mailing/distribution, and warehousing. All of our work is performed in-house to ensure the best quality products and a streamlined production process in order to save you time and money. Bindery and mailing facilities are also on site at our main plant, resulting in great flexibility and the ability to produce large runs very quickly. Every client has a dedicated personal account representative that can help you review your options and figure out what is best for your project. Our state of the art technology and equipment means lower costs, tighter deadline controls, greater accuracy and increased convenience for our customers. We are proud to be one of the first printing companies to be certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and are committed to ensuring that our paper products are environmentally friendly, socially responsible and economically viable. Connect with one of our friendly experts today 416-921-7204 Stay connected with us on social media! Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Youtube: @Humemediainc

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Signs.com

1550 Gladiola St, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84104, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Well, technically we are a bunch of sign, design and tech nerds who got together to create the best e-commerce sign site in the known universe. We wanted to create a business with one simple goal - provide the absolute best sign buying experience out there. To do that, we had to create a site with a killer design tool, offer superior customer service and produce the highest quality signs using the best materials. We launched Signs.com in 2012 with the backing of Ferrari Color. Who? Well you might not know or care who they are, but Pottery Barn, Starbucks and Lucky Brand sure do. In fact, those are only a few of the companies who use Ferrari Color to produce their signs and graphics. The good news is, because Ferrari Color is our production partner, the same level of quality and detail these awesome companies get is now available to individuals and small businesses through Signs.com. The Signs.com blog brings you daily insight from successful business owners, guest posts from industry experts and tips to help you get the most out of your signage. We also have how-tos related to the installation, maintenance and care of your professionally produced signs. So come visit us at http://www.signs.com and see the difference!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hume-media-inc-.jpeg
Hume Media Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signs-com.jpeg
Signs.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hume Media Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Signs.com
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hume Media Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Signs.com in 2025.

Incident History — Hume Media Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hume Media Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Signs.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Signs.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hume-media-inc-.jpeg
Hume Media Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signs-com.jpeg
Signs.com
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hume Media Inc. company and Signs.com company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Signs.com company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hume Media Inc. company.

In the current year, Signs.com company and Hume Media Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Signs.com company nor Hume Media Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Signs.com company nor Hume Media Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Signs.com company nor Hume Media Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hume Media Inc. company nor Signs.com company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hume Media Inc. nor Signs.com holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hume Media Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Signs.com company.

Signs.com company employs more people globally than Hume Media Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Hume Media Inc. nor Signs.com holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hume Media Inc. nor Signs.com holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hume Media Inc. nor Signs.com holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hume Media Inc. nor Signs.com holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hume Media Inc. nor Signs.com holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hume Media Inc. nor Signs.com holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N