Comparison Overview

HumanCapitalCare

VS

General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)

HumanCapitalCare

Science Park Eindhoven 5127, Son, Noord-Brabant, NL, 5692 ED
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Samen werken aan gezondheid. Vanuit deze gedachte adviseert en ondersteunt HumanCapitalCare organisaties bij een positieve en op gezondheid gerichte aanpak van werk en arbeidsomstandigheden. Het doel hierbij is het verhogen van productiviteit, kwaliteit en resultaat door het creëren van optimale arbeidsomstandigheden en het beschikken over competente, gemotiveerde en gezonde medewerkers. Hiermee leggen we de basis voor het toekomstige succes van onze klanten.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 359
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)

26 Mercy St, Bendigo, Victoria, AU, 3550
Last Update: 2025-11-26

GPSA serves as Australia’s primary organization for GP/RG supervisors and training practices, representing approximately 10,000 members. We support supervision in its various forms, prioritizing support for supervisors, practice managers, and training practices developing future general practitioners (GPs) and rural generalists (RGs). Through active engagement with our members, we advocate for enhanced training conditions, emphasizing sustainability and professional fulfillment as pivotal factors in providing best practice supervision and attracting more doctors to General Practice. GPSA is committed to fostering the enthusiasm that propels the GP training sector forward, offering service, support, research, innovation, education, and advocacy. Our vision is to champion a thriving GP training sector that is cohesive, duly acknowledged, rewarded, and respected as the cornerstone of Australia's healthcare system.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/humancapitalcare.jpeg
HumanCapitalCare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gpsupervisorsaustralia.jpeg
General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HumanCapitalCare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HumanCapitalCare in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) in 2025.

Incident History — HumanCapitalCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HumanCapitalCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/humancapitalcare.jpeg
HumanCapitalCare
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gpsupervisorsaustralia.jpeg
General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

HumanCapitalCare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to HumanCapitalCare company.

In the current year, General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company and HumanCapitalCare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company nor HumanCapitalCare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company nor HumanCapitalCare company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company nor HumanCapitalCare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither HumanCapitalCare company nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither HumanCapitalCare nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither HumanCapitalCare company nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

HumanCapitalCare company employs more people globally than General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither HumanCapitalCare nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HumanCapitalCare nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HumanCapitalCare nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HumanCapitalCare nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HumanCapitalCare nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HumanCapitalCare nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H