Comparison Overview

Humana

VS

IAG

Humana

500 W Main St, None, Louisville, Kentucky, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 650 and 699

Humana will never ask, nor require a candidate to provide money for work equipment and network access during the application process. If you become aware of any instances where you as a candidate are asked to provide information and do not believe it is a legitimate request from Humana or affiliate, please contact [email protected] to validate the request At Humana, our cultural foundation is aligned to helping members achieve their best health by delivering personalized, simplified, whole-person healthcare experiences. Recognizing healthcare needs continue to evolve for each person, for each family and for each community, Humana continuously creates innovative solutions and resources that help people live their healthiest lives on their terms –when and where they need it. Our employees are at the heart of making this happen and that’s why we are dedicated to building an organization of dynamic talent whose experience and passion center on putting the customer first.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 45,716
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

IAG

201 Sussex St, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

IAG is Australia and New Zealand's largest general insurance company with a purpose to make your world a safer place, whether you are a customer, partner, employee, shareholder or part of the communities IAG serves across Australia and New Zealand. Our businesses have helped people recover from natural disasters, accidents and loss since 1851. In Australia and New Zealand we provide insurance under many leading brands, including NRMA Insurance, CGU, SGIO, SGIC and WFI; and NZI, State, AMI and Lumley Insurance (New Zealand). We also have interests in general insurance joint ventures in Malaysia and India. Increasingly, we see our role extending beyond paying claims to increasing awareness of risk, and helping communities reduce and prevent risk. We believe it is our responsibility as an industry leader to use our influence and role as a major investor, purchaser and employer for the good of everyone. For further information please visit www.iag.com.au.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 12,323
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/humana.jpeg
Humana
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iag.jpeg
IAG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Humana
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IAG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Humana in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IAG in 2025.

Incident History — Humana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Humana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/humana.jpeg
Humana
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iag.jpeg
IAG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IAG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Humana company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Humana company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas IAG company has not reported any.

In the current year, IAG company and Humana company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Humana company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while IAG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Humana company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other IAG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Humana company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while IAG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Humana company nor IAG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Humana nor IAG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both IAG company and Humana company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Humana company employs more people globally than IAG company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Humana nor IAG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Humana nor IAG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Humana nor IAG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Humana nor IAG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Humana nor IAG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Humana nor IAG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N