Comparison Overview

Hudson River Museum

VS

Doylestown Historical Society

Hudson River Museum

511 Warburton Avenue, Yonkers, New York, US, 10701
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hrm.org

The Hudson River Museum is the largest cultural institution in Westchester County and a multidisciplinary complex that draws its identity from its site on the banks of the Hudson River, seeking to broaden the cultural horizons of all its visitors. The Museum collections focus on 19th-century through contemporary American Art; Glenview, an 1876 house on the National Register of Historic Places; Hudson Riverama, an environmental teaching gallery; a state-of-the-art, 120-seat planetarium, and a 400-seat outdoor amphitheater. It presents exhibitions, programs, teaching initiatives, research, collection, preservation, and conservation – a wide range of activities that interpret its collections, interests and communities. Visit us at hrm.org

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Doylestown Historical Society

56 S Main St, Doylestown, Pennsylvania, 18901, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://doylestownhistorical.org

"Preserving and celebrating the creative and historic significance of Doylestown and its neighboring communities"​. Collecting and preserving artifacts of our past is a major activity of the Society. But we also collect stories. The narratives are the human connection to our past and it is these stories that help bring history alive. Without the stories, all those photos, documents, and objects are just interesting things to look at. We also celebrate our past with events that commemorate Doylestown's people, places and events, so that they may long be remembered.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hudson-river-museum.jpeg
Hudson River Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doylestownhistorical.jpeg
Doylestown Historical Society
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hudson River Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Doylestown Historical Society
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hudson River Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Doylestown Historical Society in 2026.

Incident History — Hudson River Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hudson River Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Doylestown Historical Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Doylestown Historical Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hudson-river-museum.jpeg
Hudson River Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doylestownhistorical.jpeg
Doylestown Historical Society
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hudson River Museum company and Doylestown Historical Society company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Doylestown Historical Society company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hudson River Museum company.

In the current year, Doylestown Historical Society company and Hudson River Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Doylestown Historical Society company nor Hudson River Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Doylestown Historical Society company nor Hudson River Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Doylestown Historical Society company nor Hudson River Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hudson River Museum company nor Doylestown Historical Society company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Doylestown Historical Society holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hudson River Museum company nor Doylestown Historical Society company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hudson River Museum company employs more people globally than Doylestown Historical Society company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Doylestown Historical Society holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Doylestown Historical Society holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Doylestown Historical Society holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Doylestown Historical Society holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Doylestown Historical Society holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Doylestown Historical Society holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References