Comparison Overview

Hudson River Museum

VS

Art Gallery of South Australia

Hudson River Museum

511 Warburton Avenue, Yonkers, New York, US, 10701
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hrm.org

The Hudson River Museum is the largest cultural institution in Westchester County and a multidisciplinary complex that draws its identity from its site on the banks of the Hudson River, seeking to broaden the cultural horizons of all its visitors. The Museum collections focus on 19th-century through contemporary American Art; Glenview, an 1876 house on the National Register of Historic Places; Hudson Riverama, an environmental teaching gallery; a state-of-the-art, 120-seat planetarium, and a 400-seat outdoor amphitheater. It presents exhibitions, programs, teaching initiatives, research, collection, preservation, and conservation – a wide range of activities that interpret its collections, interests and communities. Visit us at hrm.org

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Art Gallery of South Australia

North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.artgallery.sa.gov.au

Founded in 1881, the Art Gallery of South Australia is home to one of Australia’s great art collections, housed in one of Adelaide’s most beautiful buildings. Located at the heart of Adelaide’s cultural boulevard, North Terrace, between the South Australian Museum and University of Adelaide, the Art Gallery welcomes approximately 780,000 visitors each year. The Art Gallery of South Australia’s collection includes approximately 42,000 works of art and design from Australia, Europe, North America and Asia. The collections feature paintings, sculptures, prints, drawings, photographs, textiles, ceramics, glass, metalwork, jewellery and an impressive representation of Australian furniture from colonial to contemporary. Open daily 10am – 5pm, closed 25 December

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hudson-river-museum.jpeg
Hudson River Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/art-gallery-of-south-australia.jpeg
Art Gallery of South Australia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hudson River Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Art Gallery of South Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hudson River Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Art Gallery of South Australia in 2026.

Incident History — Hudson River Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hudson River Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Art Gallery of South Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Art Gallery of South Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hudson-river-museum.jpeg
Hudson River Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/art-gallery-of-south-australia.jpeg
Art Gallery of South Australia
Incidents

FAQ

Both Hudson River Museum company and Art Gallery of South Australia company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Art Gallery of South Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hudson River Museum company.

In the current year, Art Gallery of South Australia company and Hudson River Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Art Gallery of South Australia company nor Hudson River Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Art Gallery of South Australia company nor Hudson River Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Art Gallery of South Australia company nor Hudson River Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hudson River Museum company nor Art Gallery of South Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Art Gallery of South Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hudson River Museum company nor Art Gallery of South Australia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Art Gallery of South Australia company employs more people globally than Hudson River Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Art Gallery of South Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Art Gallery of South Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Art Gallery of South Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Art Gallery of South Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Art Gallery of South Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hudson River Museum nor Art Gallery of South Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References