Comparison Overview

Howry Residential Services

VS

The Wise Mind Institute

Howry Residential Services

1150 Centre Pointe Curve, Mendota Heights, MN 55120, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Locally owned by Susan Howry, Howry Residential Services (HRS) has been proudly providing quality supports to people with disabilities since 1999. Employing a team of professionals who work in tandem with our clients, we employ person-centered thinking in each of our partnerships. We are made up of over 300 skilled and compassionate staff, who bring warmth, humor, and the Howry “Can Do!” attitude to all that they do. We currently offer a variety of services including residential programs, behavioral services, independent living skills, adult day programming, and professional staff training.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 96
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Wise Mind Institute

617 Veterans Blvd., Redwood City, California, 94063, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Wise Mind Institute is a training and treatment center dedicated to holistic psychotherapeutic care. Founded by Dr. Wes Pederson and Dr. Chris Harrison, the institute offers empirically supported treatments for clients and advanced training for post-doctoral clinicians. Our core values of wisdom, compassion and mindfulness inform all that we do. Our clinicians receive advanced training in the following modalities: existential-humanistic psychotherapy; Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT/RO-DBT); interpersonal neurobiology. These treatment models allow our therapists to meet the varied needs of the people who seek our assistance. The Institute offers brief and extended courses of psychotherapy for a wide range of presenting issues from struggles with minor stress to challenges with suicidal depression. We specialize in the treatment of dual diagnosis (combined substance use and mental health disorders), issues of emotional over-control and under-control, grief and loss, and life transitions. More information on our services can be found at www.thewisemindinstitute.com

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/howry-residential-services.jpeg
Howry Residential Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-wise-mind-institute.jpeg
The Wise Mind Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Howry Residential Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Wise Mind Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Howry Residential Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Wise Mind Institute in 2026.

Incident History — Howry Residential Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Howry Residential Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Wise Mind Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Wise Mind Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/howry-residential-services.jpeg
Howry Residential Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-wise-mind-institute.jpeg
The Wise Mind Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Howry Residential Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Wise Mind Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Wise Mind Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Howry Residential Services company.

In the current year, The Wise Mind Institute company and Howry Residential Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Wise Mind Institute company nor Howry Residential Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Wise Mind Institute company nor Howry Residential Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Wise Mind Institute company nor Howry Residential Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Howry Residential Services company nor The Wise Mind Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Howry Residential Services nor The Wise Mind Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Howry Residential Services company nor The Wise Mind Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Howry Residential Services company employs more people globally than The Wise Mind Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Howry Residential Services nor The Wise Mind Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Howry Residential Services nor The Wise Mind Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Howry Residential Services nor The Wise Mind Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Howry Residential Services nor The Wise Mind Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Howry Residential Services nor The Wise Mind Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Howry Residential Services nor The Wise Mind Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N