Comparison Overview

Howard Press, a FedEx Company

VS

Amber Signs & Print

Howard Press, a FedEx Company

undefined, undefined, undefined, 07203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

What started as humble beginnings in a storefront operation with three employees, Howard Press has become a leader in commercial printing. Whether offset lithography and books or business forms and tab dividers, we offer a complete lineup of printed products - all under one roof. We maintain more than 100,000 square feet of print operations in three New Jersey locations. Plus, as a wholly owned subsidiary of FedEx Office, we are backed by the vast resources of FedEx, as well as by our own expansive network of employees, vendors, and strategic partners. From project inception through distribution, Howard Press has the breadth and depth to deliver exactly what you need - when you need it.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Amber Signs & Print

59 Gossoms End, Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire, HP4 1DF, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Welcome To Amber Signs & Print of Hertfordshire Amber Signs and Print is a well established Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire based business. We have experienced, skilled designers, graphic artists and fitters to look after all aspects of your of your project, from initial conception to final completion to the very highest standards. We pride ourselves on providing the full package for all sizes of company, whether it be branding and advertising for larger companies or complete corporate identity for new and fledgeling businesses, including fascias, vehicle livery and stationary. We aim to provide our expertise at very competitive prices and our portfolio shows our significant and diverse customer base, and why people keep coming back... Please take a minute to browse our website, and feel free to contact us for a quote.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/howard-press-a-fedex-company.jpeg
Howard Press, a FedEx Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amber-signs-print.jpeg
Amber Signs & Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Howard Press, a FedEx Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amber Signs & Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Howard Press, a FedEx Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amber Signs & Print in 2025.

Incident History — Howard Press, a FedEx Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Howard Press, a FedEx Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amber Signs & Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amber Signs & Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/howard-press-a-fedex-company.jpeg
Howard Press, a FedEx Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amber-signs-print.jpeg
Amber Signs & Print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Amber Signs & Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Howard Press, a FedEx Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Amber Signs & Print company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Howard Press, a FedEx Company company.

In the current year, Amber Signs & Print company and Howard Press, a FedEx Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Amber Signs & Print company nor Howard Press, a FedEx Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Amber Signs & Print company nor Howard Press, a FedEx Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Amber Signs & Print company nor Howard Press, a FedEx Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Howard Press, a FedEx Company company nor Amber Signs & Print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Howard Press, a FedEx Company nor Amber Signs & Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Howard Press, a FedEx Company company nor Amber Signs & Print company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Howard Press, a FedEx Company company employs more people globally than Amber Signs & Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Howard Press, a FedEx Company nor Amber Signs & Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Howard Press, a FedEx Company nor Amber Signs & Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Howard Press, a FedEx Company nor Amber Signs & Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Howard Press, a FedEx Company nor Amber Signs & Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Howard Press, a FedEx Company nor Amber Signs & Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Howard Press, a FedEx Company nor Amber Signs & Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N