Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Houston Radiology Associated (HRA)Houston Radiology Associated (HRA)
VS
Sutter HealthSutter Health
Houston Radiology Associated (HRA)

Houston Radiology Associated (HRA)

2190 North Loop W, Houston, 77008, US

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
704/1000Moderate

Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) is one of the most trusted and well established radiology practices in Texas. Serving the Houston metropolitan area and Houston Methodist health system for over 70 years, HRA incorporates sub-specialty training to remain at the forefr...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:39
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Sutter Health

Sutter Health

2200 River Plaza Drive, Sacramento, 95833, US

Last Update: 23/06/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.sutterhealth.org
614/1000Poor

Sutter Health is a not-for-profit, people-centered healthcare system providing comprehensive care throughout California. Sutter Health is committed to innovative, high-quality patient care and community partnerships, and innovative, high-quality patient care. Today, Sut...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:25,099
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Houston Radiology Associated (HRA)

Houston Radiology Associated (HRA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sutter Health

Sutter Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sutter Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sutter Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sutter Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Houston Radiology Associated (HRA)

Houston Radiology Associated (HRA)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HOU1767654386
Sutter Health

Sutter Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUT1765814693
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUTCAM1782210474
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUT44271123

FAQ

Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) company and Sutter Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) company and Sutter Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) company and Sutter Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) company and Sutter Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) company and Sutter Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) company and Sutter Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) company and Sutter Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) company and Sutter Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) company and Sutter Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) company and Sutter Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) company and Sutter Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) and Sutter Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) and Sutter Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) or Sutter Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) or Sutter Health ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) and Sutter Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Houston Radiology Associated (HRA) and Sutter Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2