Comparison Overview

Hotel Beacon NYC

VS

Kempinski Hotels

Hotel Beacon NYC

2130 Broadway, New York, NY, 10023, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to the Hotel Beacon on linkedIn! A place for current and past employees to connect and remain current on what is happening at the hotel.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Kempinski Hotels

Maximilianstrasse 17, Munich, 80539, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Founded in Germany in 1897, Kempinski Hotels has long reflected the finest traditions of European hospitality. Today, as ever, Kempinski is synonymous with distinctive luxury. Located in many of the world's most well-known cities and resorts, the Kempinski collection includes hotels in a grand manner, pace-setting modern establishments and older hotels of individual charm. All blend gracefully into their surroundings and offer luxurious accommodations, superb cuisine and unrivalled facilities - complemented by impeccable service. For leisure and business guests alike, the name Kempinski has long been synonymous with style, mobility and efficiency. Put simply, they are the first choice for the discerning individual. In addition to operating many of the finest city hotels in the world, Kempinski is a name that can now be found in many exciting resort locations, each combining local flair and ambience with the international standards of service and luxury that Kempinski guests have come to expect. To see all the different Kempinski jobs and apply please go to https://kempinski.jobs

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 13,663
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hotel-beacon-nyc.jpeg
Hotel Beacon NYC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kempinski-hotels.jpeg
Kempinski Hotels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hotel Beacon NYC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kempinski Hotels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hotel Beacon NYC in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kempinski Hotels in 2025.

Incident History — Hotel Beacon NYC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hotel Beacon NYC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kempinski Hotels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kempinski Hotels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hotel-beacon-nyc.jpeg
Hotel Beacon NYC
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2015
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Third-party Intrusion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kempinski-hotels.jpeg
Kempinski Hotels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kempinski Hotels company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hotel Beacon NYC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hotel Beacon NYC company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Kempinski Hotels company has not reported any.

In the current year, Kempinski Hotels company and Hotel Beacon NYC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kempinski Hotels company nor Hotel Beacon NYC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kempinski Hotels company nor Hotel Beacon NYC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Hotel Beacon NYC company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Kempinski Hotels company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hotel Beacon NYC company nor Kempinski Hotels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hotel Beacon NYC nor Kempinski Hotels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hotel Beacon NYC company nor Kempinski Hotels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kempinski Hotels company employs more people globally than Hotel Beacon NYC company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Hotel Beacon NYC nor Kempinski Hotels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hotel Beacon NYC nor Kempinski Hotels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hotel Beacon NYC nor Kempinski Hotels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hotel Beacon NYC nor Kempinski Hotels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hotel Beacon NYC nor Kempinski Hotels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hotel Beacon NYC nor Kempinski Hotels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H