Comparison Overview

Hot Stix Golf

VS

Sun Mountain Sports

Hot Stix Golf

15444 N. 76th Street, #110, Scottsdale, AZ, 85260, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Hot Stix Golf custom golf club fitting is a brand agnostic company using state of the art launch monitors and proprietary fitting software to find the best head, shaft, grip combination for every unique player and swing. Our philosophy is simple, golf is a game of misses, we promote "Better Misses". We believe all fittings must take place outdoors to get flight validation. Our process of fitting the shaft first enables us to find the shaft that allows the player to get the club head back to square with the greatest of ease.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sun Mountain Sports

301 N 1st St W, Missoula, Montana, 59802, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For over 35 years Sun Mountain has been a pioneer in the golf industry, revolutionizing golf bags, golf outerwear and golf carts. Sun Mountain's many innovations, including the first lightweight golf bag and modern stand bag, have made it the top golf bag company in North America. Within golf outerwear, Sun Mountain redefined golf-specific performance first with the windshirt, then fleece, and again with its four-way stretch, waterproof, and breathable rain wear. The Sun Mountain Speed Cart® golf push cart transformed walking carts and created an entirely new category of golf products. Sun Mountain's "Ahead of Time Design"​ motto drives the company to continually design and refine golf equipment.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hot-stix-golf.jpeg
Hot Stix Golf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sun-mountain-sports.jpeg
Sun Mountain Sports
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hot Stix Golf
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sun Mountain Sports
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hot Stix Golf in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sun Mountain Sports in 2025.

Incident History — Hot Stix Golf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hot Stix Golf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sun Mountain Sports (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sun Mountain Sports cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hot-stix-golf.jpeg
Hot Stix Golf
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sun-mountain-sports.jpeg
Sun Mountain Sports
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hot Stix Golf company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sun Mountain Sports company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sun Mountain Sports company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hot Stix Golf company.

In the current year, Sun Mountain Sports company and Hot Stix Golf company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sun Mountain Sports company nor Hot Stix Golf company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sun Mountain Sports company nor Hot Stix Golf company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sun Mountain Sports company nor Hot Stix Golf company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hot Stix Golf company nor Sun Mountain Sports company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hot Stix Golf nor Sun Mountain Sports holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hot Stix Golf company nor Sun Mountain Sports company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sun Mountain Sports company employs more people globally than Hot Stix Golf company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Hot Stix Golf nor Sun Mountain Sports holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hot Stix Golf nor Sun Mountain Sports holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hot Stix Golf nor Sun Mountain Sports holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hot Stix Golf nor Sun Mountain Sports holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hot Stix Golf nor Sun Mountain Sports holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hot Stix Golf nor Sun Mountain Sports holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H