Comparison Overview

Horsham Clinic

VS

Returning Veterans Project

Horsham Clinic

722 E Butler Pike, Ambler, Pennsylvania, US, 19002-2310
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

For more than 60 years, The Horsham Clinic in Ambler, Pennsylvania has helped children, teens, adults and older adults manage and overcome a number of mental health issues at its 55-acre campus in suburban Philadelphia. The Horsham Clinic is committed to providing quality behavioral healthcare services that effectively and efficiently meet the individual needs of every patient from the population we serve. We are committed to restoring every patient’s emotional well-being through interdisciplinary clinical programs and care that are provided by highly skilled professionals. At Horsham, we recognize that each person has a unique pathway to recovery. We embrace the principles of recovery and resiliency and include them in the treatment planning process and care delivery system. We encourage the patients we serve to help them lead, control and exercise choice in the care they receive here at The Horsham Clinic. We encourage patients to grow and learn from their treatment, as well as develop their full potential to enjoy their quality of life with families, friends and within their community. The Horsham Clinic is located on a beautiful 55-acre suburban campus in Ambler, Pennsylvania; in Montgomery County, near Philadelphia. The Horsham Clinic offers inpatient hospitalization services for children, adolescents, adults and older adults, and partial hospitalization services for children, teenagers and adults at its Ambler campus. We also offer partial hospitalization services for children and teens at satellite locations in Broomall, Delaware County and Coatesville, Chester County.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 252
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Returning Veterans Project

PO Box 14035, Portland, 97293, US
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

Our mission is to provide free, confidential mental and physical health services to Veterans, Service Members, and their families. Our vision is an improved quality of life for Veterans, Service Members, and their families. We believe it is our collective responsibility to offer support, healing, and access to mental and physical health services for our Veteran communities in Oregon and Southwest Washington. We support our mission by recruiting a network of licensed, independent mental and physical health providers who are willing to contribute their services free of cost to Veterans, Service Members, and their families. In addition to the work we do to recruit and support the provider network, we also; • Educate and mobilize our community to raise awareness regarding the challenges experienced by returning veterans, service members, and their families • Host clinical workshops to provide further training to our volunteer providers • Link veterans, service members, and their families to current and relevant information and resources • Partner and collaborate with military and civilian Veteran Service Organizations to maximize our ability to give back and reach our Veterans communities The Returning Veterans Project depends solely on private donations from individuals, foundations, small business, and corporations.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/horsham-clinic.jpeg
Horsham Clinic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/returning-veterans-project.jpeg
Returning Veterans Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Horsham Clinic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Returning Veterans Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Horsham Clinic in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Returning Veterans Project in 2026.

Incident History — Horsham Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Horsham Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Returning Veterans Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Returning Veterans Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/horsham-clinic.jpeg
Horsham Clinic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/returning-veterans-project.jpeg
Returning Veterans Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Horsham Clinic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Returning Veterans Project company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Returning Veterans Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Horsham Clinic company.

In the current year, Returning Veterans Project company and Horsham Clinic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Returning Veterans Project company nor Horsham Clinic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Returning Veterans Project company nor Horsham Clinic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Returning Veterans Project company nor Horsham Clinic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Horsham Clinic company nor Returning Veterans Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Horsham Clinic nor Returning Veterans Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Horsham Clinic company nor Returning Veterans Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Horsham Clinic company employs more people globally than Returning Veterans Project company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Horsham Clinic nor Returning Veterans Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Horsham Clinic nor Returning Veterans Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Horsham Clinic nor Returning Veterans Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Horsham Clinic nor Returning Veterans Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Horsham Clinic nor Returning Veterans Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Horsham Clinic nor Returning Veterans Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N