Comparison Overview

Hopewood Recovery Center

VS

The Manor Clinic

Hopewood Recovery Center

3046 Carlbrook Rd, South Boston, Virginia, US, 24592
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Hopewood Recovery Center provides a partial hospitalization program for adult females. Our facility sits on a tranquil campus located in southern Virginia just 30 miles from the North Carolina border. Hopewood is easily accessible from nearby communities, just 60 miles south of Lynchburg, VA, and 75 miles southeast of Roanoke, VA.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Manor Clinic

None
Last Update:

Located in Southampton, The Manor Clinic is a world class 15-bed addiction treatment centre that provides state-of-the-art care for men and women who are seeking to break free from addiction, chemical dependency, and co-occurring mental health disorders. Individuals who choose to heal at The Manor Clinic become part of a dynamic community that exists to support the efforts of individuals who are seeking to overcome substance misuse. In a small, intimate setting that is both safe and conducive to recovery, individuals are provided with extensive attention and effective interventions that allow them to lay a foundation for the substance-free lives they deserve to be living. The Manor Clinic employees a team of dedicated professionals who are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to help men and women experience the improved physical and mental health that comes about when they leave substance misuse in the past. The Manor Clinic is committed to providing the individualised care that can allow individuals to have the best possible chance of breaking the cycle of substance misuse and moving into a healthier life. The types of care that The Manor Clinic provides includes: • 7-day medically assisted detox • 14-day rehabilitation • 28-day detox and rehabilitation Using only the most effective evidence-based treatment methods, The Manor Clinic has a history of success in helping individuals overcome addictions to substances such as: • Alcohol • Cocaine • Heroin • Marijuana • Methamphetamine • Opioid pain medications • Non-opioid prescription medications In addition, The Manor Clinic is well equipped to help individuals who are struggling with co-occurring mental health disorders in addition to primary substance misuse, including Bipolar affective disorder If you or someone you love might benefit from the top-notch care provided at The Manor Clinic, please do not hesitate to contact us or speak with your GP as soon as possible.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hopewood-recovery-center.jpeg
Hopewood Recovery Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-manor-clinic.jpeg
The Manor Clinic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hopewood Recovery Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Manor Clinic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hopewood Recovery Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Manor Clinic in 2026.

Incident History — Hopewood Recovery Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hopewood Recovery Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Manor Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Manor Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hopewood-recovery-center.jpeg
Hopewood Recovery Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-manor-clinic.jpeg
The Manor Clinic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Manor Clinic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hopewood Recovery Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Manor Clinic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hopewood Recovery Center company.

In the current year, The Manor Clinic company and Hopewood Recovery Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Manor Clinic company nor Hopewood Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Manor Clinic company nor Hopewood Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Manor Clinic company nor Hopewood Recovery Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hopewood Recovery Center company nor The Manor Clinic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hopewood Recovery Center nor The Manor Clinic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hopewood Recovery Center company nor The Manor Clinic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Manor Clinic company employs more people globally than Hopewood Recovery Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Hopewood Recovery Center nor The Manor Clinic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hopewood Recovery Center nor The Manor Clinic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hopewood Recovery Center nor The Manor Clinic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hopewood Recovery Center nor The Manor Clinic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hopewood Recovery Center nor The Manor Clinic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hopewood Recovery Center nor The Manor Clinic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N