Comparison Overview

Hopebridge

VS

Center for Children

Hopebridge

3500 Depauw Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN, 46268, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hopebridge.com

Hopebridge Autism Therapy Centers offers a wide range of outpatient services designed to meet the needs of children requiring behavioral diagnosis and applied behavioral analysis (ABA), occupational, feeding, and speech treatments in center, home and school settings. We have therapy centers in Indiana, Kentucky, Georgia, Ohio, Colorado, Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, Arkansas, Alabama, Oklahoma, and Tennessee. Pediatricians and parents across the US trust Hopebridge for its expertise in treating neurological, genetic, sensory processing, and feeding disorders; language delays; and behavioral concerns. Children with special needs require extraordinary, individualized care and Hopebridge’s staff helps families understand their children's difficulties while working to help them realize their potential.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 2,662
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Center for Children

6100 Radio Station Road, La Plata, Maryland, 20646, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.center-for-children.org

The Center for Children is a private, non-profit organization that provides comprehensive mental health services to children and their families. The Center for Children believes that every child in need should have the opportunity to receive quality mental health care. We are dedicated to the prevention and treatment of child abuse and the promotion of positive mental health through crisis intervention, therapy, education, and advocacy. With offices in La Plata and Leonardtown, Maryland, the Center for Children serves clients from Charles, St. Mary's, Calvert, and lower Prince George's counties.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 196
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hopebridge.jpeg
Hopebridge
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-children.jpeg
Center for Children
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hopebridge
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Children
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hopebridge in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Children in 2026.

Incident History — Hopebridge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hopebridge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Children (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Children cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hopebridge.jpeg
Hopebridge
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-children.jpeg
Center for Children
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hopebridge company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for Children company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Children company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hopebridge company.

In the current year, Center for Children company and Hopebridge company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Children company nor Hopebridge company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Children company nor Hopebridge company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Children company nor Hopebridge company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hopebridge company nor Center for Children company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hopebridge nor Center for Children holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hopebridge company nor Center for Children company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hopebridge company employs more people globally than Center for Children company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Hopebridge nor Center for Children holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hopebridge nor Center for Children holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hopebridge nor Center for Children holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hopebridge nor Center for Children holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hopebridge nor Center for Children holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hopebridge nor Center for Children holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References