Comparison Overview

Hope Ranch

VS

Pineapple Furniture

Hope Ranch

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hoperanch.org

Hope Ranch is a community of 773 lots encompassing 1,863 acres. It is situated in the southeastern portion of Santa Barbara County between Highway 101 and the ocean. It consists of a broad flat mesa and low rolling knolls broken by a magnificent valley and covered with splendid live oaks.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Pineapple Furniture

Westmead, Maidstone, Kent, ME20 6XJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pineapplecontracts.com

Pineapple Contract Furniture have been providing furniture to the contract healthcare market over 40 years and have an excellent reputation for their honest, friendly and reliable service. All furniture ranges are strength and stability tested to BS EN 15373:2007 and all fabrics fire retardant to BS 7176:2007 source 5. Pineapple furniture meets a variety of needs - ward furniture is designed to be safe, durable and cost effective. For more challenging environments, reinforced sofas are available carefully designed to minimise ligature risks and make furniture as safe as possible for staff as well as clients. Pineapple Contracts operate a “customer for life” culture in the way customers are looked after, offering a 7-year guarantee against manufacturing faults and a dedicated and efficient after sales team. A free space planning service complete with CAD drawings is available on request. The full furniture range and examples of completed schemes can be found at www.pineapplecontracts.com. All enquiries can be directed to [email protected] or 01622 237830.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 129
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Hope Ranch
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pineapple-contracts.jpeg
Pineapple Furniture
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hope Ranch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pineapple Furniture
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hope Ranch in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pineapple Furniture in 2025.

Incident History — Hope Ranch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hope Ranch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pineapple Furniture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pineapple Furniture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Hope Ranch
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pineapple-contracts.jpeg
Pineapple Furniture
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hope Ranch company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pineapple Furniture company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pineapple Furniture company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hope Ranch company.

In the current year, Pineapple Furniture company and Hope Ranch company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pineapple Furniture company nor Hope Ranch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pineapple Furniture company nor Hope Ranch company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pineapple Furniture company nor Hope Ranch company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hope Ranch company nor Pineapple Furniture company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hope Ranch nor Pineapple Furniture holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hope Ranch company nor Pineapple Furniture company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pineapple Furniture company employs more people globally than Hope Ranch company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Hope Ranch nor Pineapple Furniture holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hope Ranch nor Pineapple Furniture holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hope Ranch nor Pineapple Furniture holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hope Ranch nor Pineapple Furniture holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hope Ranch nor Pineapple Furniture holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hope Ranch nor Pineapple Furniture holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References