Comparison Overview

Hop Lun

VS

Shaw Industries

Hop Lun

33/F, 9 Wing Hong Street, Cheung Sha Wan Kowloon, HK
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hoplun.com

Hop Lun is a leading international fashion lingerie and swimwear company headquartered in Hong Kong. Since 1992, we have been steadfast in our commitment to delivering top-quality fashion lingerie and swimwear to major retailers worldwide. With a dedicated workforce of over 28,000 employees, we operate 10 strategically located manufacturing facilities in Bangladesh, China, and Indonesia. Supported by a centralized Development & Operations Centre (formerly PPO) and logistics centre in South China, we ensure efficient processes and timely delivery of our products. In September 2022, Hop Lun achieved a significant milestone as Platinum Equity acquired a majority interest in our company, further solidifying our position for accelerated success. We take immense pride in our dedication to excellence and look forward to continuing to provide fashionable and high-quality lingerie and swimwear to customers around the world.

NAICS: 313
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Shaw Industries

616 East Walnut Ave, Dalton, GA, 30720, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.shawinc.com

Shaw is more than 18,000 associates worldwide bound together by a common vision to create a better future. By combining deep market knowledge with new ways of thinking, we drive innovation into our business and set the standard for next generation manufacturing. Shaw supplies carpet, resilient, hardwood, tile and stone flooring products and synthetic turf to residential and commercial markets worldwide. We are a wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. Shaw is headquartered in Dalton, Ga., with salespeople and/or offices located throughout the U.S., Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, India, Mexico, Singapore, United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom.

NAICS: 313
NAICS Definition: Textile Mills
Employees: 12,564
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hop-lun.jpeg
Hop Lun
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shaw-industries.jpeg
Shaw Industries
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hop Lun
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shaw Industries
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Textile Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hop Lun in 2025.

Incidents vs Textile Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shaw Industries in 2025.

Incident History — Hop Lun (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hop Lun cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shaw Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shaw Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hop-lun.jpeg
Hop Lun
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shaw-industries.jpeg
Shaw Industries
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Shaw Industries company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hop Lun company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Shaw Industries company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hop Lun company.

In the current year, Shaw Industries company and Hop Lun company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shaw Industries company nor Hop Lun company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shaw Industries company nor Hop Lun company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shaw Industries company nor Hop Lun company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hop Lun company nor Shaw Industries company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hop Lun nor Shaw Industries holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Shaw Industries company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hop Lun company.

Shaw Industries company employs more people globally than Hop Lun company, reflecting its scale as a Textile Manufacturing.

Neither Hop Lun nor Shaw Industries holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hop Lun nor Shaw Industries holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hop Lun nor Shaw Industries holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hop Lun nor Shaw Industries holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hop Lun nor Shaw Industries holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hop Lun nor Shaw Industries holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A weakness has been identified in itsourcecode Online Pet Shop Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /pet1/addcnp.php. This manipulation of the argument cnpname causes sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda AX9 22.03.01.46. This affects the function image_check of the component httpd. The manipulation results in use of weak hash. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.6
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A weakness has been identified in code-projects Student File Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/update_student.php. This manipulation of the argument stud_id causes sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Student File Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/save_user.php. The manipulation of the argument firstname results in sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in code-projects Student File Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/update_user.php. The manipulation of the argument user_id leads to sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-13
Updated
Date
2025-12-13
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References