Comparison Overview

Harrah's Hoosier Park

VS

Metropolitan Gaming

Harrah's Hoosier Park

4500 Dan Patch Circle, Anderson, 46013, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Harrah’s Hoosier Park, which is owned and operated by a subsidiary of Caesars Entertainment Corporation (NASDAQ: CZR), holds multiple awards from industry publications for customer service, entertainment, gaming, dining, and team member culture. Harrah’s Hoosier Park, a fully-integrated gaming and racing facility, features 2,000 of the latest slots and electronic table games, sports wagering, and a 7/8 mile oval horse track offering live harness racing each year. Simulcast wagering is offered year-round at Harrah's Hoosier Park Racing & Casino, and Winner's Circle Race, Sports, Pub locations in Downtown Indianapolis and New Haven, Ind. For more information, please visit www.HarrahsHoosierPark.com. Must be 18 or older to wager on horse racing at racetracks and 21 or older to gamble at sports books and casinos. Know When To Stop Before You Start.® Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-9-WITH-IT (1-800-994-8448) ©2019 Caesars License Company, LLC.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 316
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Metropolitan Gaming

Fourth floor, 265 Tottenham Court Road, Bloomsbury, London, England, W1T 7RQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Metropolitan Gaming brands in in the UK include the Metropolitan Casino in Mayfair, Empire Casino, The Sportsman, Park Lane Club London, The Rendezvous (Brighton), Manchester235, and Alea Casinos (Nottingham and Glasgow). International properties include three casinos in Egypt. The Metropolitan portfolio also includes celebrity chef restaurants by James Martin and Marco Pierre White, and a sports bar in partnership with Budweiser.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 425
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hoosier-park.jpeg
Harrah's Hoosier Park
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caesars-entertainment-emea.jpeg
Metropolitan Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Harrah's Hoosier Park
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Metropolitan Gaming
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harrah's Hoosier Park in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metropolitan Gaming in 2025.

Incident History — Harrah's Hoosier Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harrah's Hoosier Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Metropolitan Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metropolitan Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hoosier-park.jpeg
Harrah's Hoosier Park
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caesars-entertainment-emea.jpeg
Metropolitan Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Harrah's Hoosier Park company and Metropolitan Gaming company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Metropolitan Gaming company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Harrah's Hoosier Park company.

In the current year, Metropolitan Gaming company and Harrah's Hoosier Park company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Metropolitan Gaming company nor Harrah's Hoosier Park company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Metropolitan Gaming company nor Harrah's Hoosier Park company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Metropolitan Gaming company nor Harrah's Hoosier Park company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Harrah's Hoosier Park company nor Metropolitan Gaming company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Harrah's Hoosier Park nor Metropolitan Gaming holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Metropolitan Gaming company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Harrah's Hoosier Park company.

Metropolitan Gaming company employs more people globally than Harrah's Hoosier Park company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Harrah's Hoosier Park nor Metropolitan Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Harrah's Hoosier Park nor Metropolitan Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Harrah's Hoosier Park nor Metropolitan Gaming holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Harrah's Hoosier Park nor Metropolitan Gaming holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Harrah's Hoosier Park nor Metropolitan Gaming holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Harrah's Hoosier Park nor Metropolitan Gaming holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H