Comparison Overview

Hoosier Jiffy Print

VS

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.

Hoosier Jiffy Print

1417 West Kem Road, IN, Marion, 46952, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Why choose Hoosier Jiffy Print for all your printing needs? -Experienced Professionals -Quality Service -Exceptional Results We can take your project from concept to finish, saving you valuable time and energy. We provide design, printing, bindery, mailing, screenprinting, and embroidery services. If you want quality product, fast speed, and the best customer service, Hoosier Jiffy Print is for you!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.

5651 Kimball Ct, Chino, California, 91710, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

At M&M Printed Bag, Inc. our Plastic Bags product line is diverse and designed to meet the specific needs of various sectors. In addition to our standard plastic bags, we also provide specialty bags tailored to specific industry needs. These include anti-static bags, tamper-evident bags, biohazard bags, and more. These specialized bags are designed to address unique packaging challenges and ensure the safety and security of the contents.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hoosier-jiffy-print.jpeg
Hoosier Jiffy Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-printed-bag-inc.jpeg
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hoosier Jiffy Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hoosier Jiffy Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M&M Printed Bag, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Hoosier Jiffy Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hoosier Jiffy Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — M&M Printed Bag, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hoosier-jiffy-print.jpeg
Hoosier Jiffy Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-printed-bag-inc.jpeg
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hoosier Jiffy Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hoosier Jiffy Print company.

In the current year, M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company and Hoosier Jiffy Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor Hoosier Jiffy Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor Hoosier Jiffy Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor Hoosier Jiffy Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hoosier Jiffy Print company nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hoosier Jiffy Print nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hoosier Jiffy Print company nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hoosier Jiffy Print company employs more people globally than M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Hoosier Jiffy Print nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hoosier Jiffy Print nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hoosier Jiffy Print nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hoosier Jiffy Print nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hoosier Jiffy Print nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hoosier Jiffy Print nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N