Comparison Overview

Hoop

VS

Brandenburg

Hoop

London, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hoop.co.uk

Hoop - the incredible app that helps parents and kids to find activities. We will only list healthy activities, classes or events on our app. Prior to Covid19, Hoop was used by over 1,000,000 families. I'm re-launching it in 2022 so parents can get this amazing resource back. It's the best. It really is! ... Tim (Dad, CEO)

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Brandenburg

29 Navigation Drive, Brierley Hill, West Midlands, DY5 1UT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
https://b-one.com/

Our vision is to develop sustainable and innovative solutions, providing peace of mind, protecting public health and working in harmony with nature. Our leading commercial and retail brands deliver innovative pest management solutions and garden care products to a global customer base of more than 4,500. Our brands include B&G Equipment, Insect-O-Cutor, Network Bird.B.Gone, Edialux , Green Choice and Pest Stop.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hoop-health.jpeg
Hoop
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandenburg-uk-ltd.jpeg
Brandenburg
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hoop
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brandenburg
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hoop in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brandenburg in 2025.

Incident History — Hoop (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hoop cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brandenburg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brandenburg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hoop-health.jpeg
Hoop
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandenburg-uk-ltd.jpeg
Brandenburg
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brandenburg company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hoop company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brandenburg company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hoop company.

In the current year, Brandenburg company and Hoop company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brandenburg company nor Hoop company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brandenburg company nor Hoop company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brandenburg company nor Hoop company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hoop company nor Brandenburg company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hoop nor Brandenburg holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hoop company nor Brandenburg company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brandenburg company employs more people globally than Hoop company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither Hoop nor Brandenburg holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hoop nor Brandenburg holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hoop nor Brandenburg holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hoop nor Brandenburg holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hoop nor Brandenburg holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hoop nor Brandenburg holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References