Comparison Overview

Hoof Prints

VS

Birmingham Printing

Hoof Prints

109 S. Scott St. A-5, Spokane, Washington 99202, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

With over ten years of experience Hoof Prints offers a wide range of printing and graphic design services. From black and white copies to spot and full color printing we are your perfect partner in making your business a successfull business! We have multiple paper stocks available for you to choose from. We also offer specialty services such as diecutting, embossing and foiling. We are here to serve our customers with products that fulfill their printing needs. Our friendly and knowledgeable staff will help guide, educate, and solve your printing problems. We strive to be the preferred partner in helping our clients succeed in the evolving market. We handle everything from start to finish! Our talented and award winning graphic designers work closely with you throughout your entire job. Contact us today to place an order or get a quote!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Birmingham Printing

3101 Sixth Avenue South , Birmingham , Alabama, 35233, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Over the past 100+ years, Birmingham Printing's reputation for excellence in service and value has flourished. As our relationships increased, so have the facilities and the diversity of the commercial printing products and services we offer to our customers. The one thing that has not changed is our commitment to be more than just a printer; we build relationships by getting to know our customers business and specific needs. We are more than just ink on paper.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hoof-prints.jpeg
Hoof Prints
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bhamprinting.jpeg
Birmingham Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hoof Prints
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Birmingham Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hoof Prints in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Birmingham Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Hoof Prints (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hoof Prints cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Birmingham Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Birmingham Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hoof-prints.jpeg
Hoof Prints
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bhamprinting.jpeg
Birmingham Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hoof Prints company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Birmingham Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Birmingham Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hoof Prints company.

In the current year, Birmingham Printing company and Hoof Prints company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Birmingham Printing company nor Hoof Prints company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Birmingham Printing company nor Hoof Prints company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Birmingham Printing company nor Hoof Prints company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hoof Prints company nor Birmingham Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hoof Prints nor Birmingham Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Birmingham Printing company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hoof Prints company.

Birmingham Printing company employs more people globally than Hoof Prints company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Hoof Prints nor Birmingham Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hoof Prints nor Birmingham Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hoof Prints nor Birmingham Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hoof Prints nor Birmingham Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hoof Prints nor Birmingham Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hoof Prints nor Birmingham Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N