Comparison Overview

Honolulu Museum of Art

VS

Journal of the American Institute for Conservation

Honolulu Museum of Art

900 S Beretania St, None, Honolulu, HI, US, 96814
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

The Honolulu Museum of Art is a unique gathering place where art, global worldviews, culture, and education converge right in the heart of Honolulu, and a vital part of Hawaiʻi’s cultural landscape. In addition to international-caliber temporary exhibitions, the museum features an extensive permanent collection, an art school, an independent art house theatre, and a cafe, all housed within one of the most beautiful and iconic buildings in Honolulu.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 131
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Journal of the American Institute for Conservation

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Journal of the American Institute for Conservation (JAIC) is the primary vehicle for the publication of peer-reviewed technical studies, research papers, treatment case studies and ethics and standards discussions relating to the broad field of conservation and preservation of historic and cultural works. Subscribers to JAIC include AIC members, both individuals and institutions, as well as major libraries and universities.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/honolulu-museum-of-art.jpeg
Honolulu Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/journal-of-the-american-institute-for-conservation.jpeg
Journal of the American Institute for Conservation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Honolulu Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Journal of the American Institute for Conservation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Honolulu Museum of Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Journal of the American Institute for Conservation in 2025.

Incident History — Honolulu Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Honolulu Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Journal of the American Institute for Conservation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Journal of the American Institute for Conservation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/honolulu-museum-of-art.jpeg
Honolulu Museum of Art
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/journal-of-the-american-institute-for-conservation.jpeg
Journal of the American Institute for Conservation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Honolulu Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Honolulu Museum of Art company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company has not reported any.

In the current year, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company and Honolulu Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company nor Honolulu Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Honolulu Museum of Art company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company nor Honolulu Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Honolulu Museum of Art company nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Honolulu Museum of Art nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Honolulu Museum of Art company nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Honolulu Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Journal of the American Institute for Conservation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Honolulu Museum of Art nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Honolulu Museum of Art nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Honolulu Museum of Art nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Honolulu Museum of Art nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Honolulu Museum of Art nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Honolulu Museum of Art nor Journal of the American Institute for Conservation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X