Comparison Overview

Honey Legal

VS

Gordons LLP

Honey Legal

The Old Magistrates Court, Cheshire Street, Market Drayton, Shropshire, GB, TF9 1PH
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At Honey, we're all about taking care of people. Pure and simple. After all, estate planning and wealth management is all about making sure you and your loved ones are looked after, now and in the future. So we do the same for our customers when it comes to their assets. Always down to earth, we take care of all the complicated legalities. Meaning our customers can enjoy living their lives without the worry about what the future may bring. With a team of over 100 head office employees and a national network of over 200 Consultants, we have helped more than 73,000 families to protect the people they love and the things they've worked hard for. We have protected over £21bn of assets protected to date.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 137
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gordons LLP

Riverside West, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS1 4AW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We understand that clients want straightforward, practical advice from people they trust. Gordons is a firm that values relationships above all, because we know they underpin our continued success and that of our clients. We work in partnership with businesses and individuals needing fast, effective legal advice. We clarify rather than complicate, rapidly identifying issues and creating opportunities for our clients. At Gordons, we believe in hard work and professionalism combined with a personal touch. We are a firm that clients want to deal with, and return to, because we’re trusted as people and valued as lawyers.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 225
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gordons-llp.jpeg
Gordons LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Honey Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gordons LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Honey Legal in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gordons LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Honey Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Honey Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gordons LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gordons LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/honeylegal.jpeg
Honey Legal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gordons-llp.jpeg
Gordons LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Honey Legal company and Gordons LLP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Gordons LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Honey Legal company.

In the current year, Gordons LLP company and Honey Legal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gordons LLP company nor Honey Legal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gordons LLP company nor Honey Legal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gordons LLP company nor Honey Legal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Honey Legal company nor Gordons LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Honey Legal nor Gordons LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gordons LLP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Honey Legal company.

Gordons LLP company employs more people globally than Honey Legal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Honey Legal nor Gordons LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Honey Legal nor Gordons LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Honey Legal nor Gordons LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Honey Legal nor Gordons LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Honey Legal nor Gordons LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Honey Legal nor Gordons LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X