Comparison Overview

Homotopia

VS

BalletMet

Homotopia

26 Hope Street, Liverpool, GB, L1 9BX
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2004, Homotopia is a Liverpool based arts & social justice organisation making a cultural impact through art and activism. Our aim is to support and platform local, national and international LGBTQIA socially engaged artists and creatives. Every October/November we present Homotopia Festival , featuring a variety of LGBTQIA art across multiple venues and outdoor spaces in the city. In addition to our festival, we have a year-round programme of artist development, public artworks and events.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BalletMet

BalletMet Dance Centre, Columbus, Ohio, 43215, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

BalletMet, renowned for its versatility and innovative repertory, ranks among the nation’s largest dance companies, and its Dance Academy ranks among the largest dance-training centers. Since its inception in 1978, BalletMet has produced more than 120 world premieres. It has also developed Dance Access and Education programs that serve nearly 30,000 people annually. Up to 70 scholarships each year give access to talented students who otherwise may not be able to participate.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/homotopiafest.jpeg
Homotopia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/balletmet-columbus.jpeg
BalletMet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Homotopia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BalletMet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Homotopia in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BalletMet in 2025.

Incident History — Homotopia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Homotopia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BalletMet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BalletMet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/homotopiafest.jpeg
Homotopia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/balletmet-columbus.jpeg
BalletMet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BalletMet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Homotopia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BalletMet company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Homotopia company.

In the current year, BalletMet company and Homotopia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BalletMet company nor Homotopia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BalletMet company nor Homotopia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BalletMet company nor Homotopia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Homotopia company nor BalletMet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Homotopia nor BalletMet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Homotopia company nor BalletMet company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BalletMet company employs more people globally than Homotopia company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Homotopia nor BalletMet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Homotopia nor BalletMet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Homotopia nor BalletMet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Homotopia nor BalletMet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Homotopia nor BalletMet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Homotopia nor BalletMet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N