Comparison Overview

Hollywood Monster

VS

Polymark Group

Hollywood Monster

: The Studios, Birmingham, B11 2BF, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Hollywood Monster is one of the UK’s largest signage and wide format printers; with offices in Birmingham, London and Edinburgh. This family-run business was created in August 2009 with the merger of two sister companies Hollywood Signs and Monster Digital, combining a total of 30 years’ signage experience. With a 30,000sq warehouse and over 70 employees, Hollywood Monster continues to build a strong reputation. Working with some of the biggest names in a range of sectors including, commercial, construction, events, exhibitions, property, retail, TV, theatre and sport. We provide clients with a variety of graphics and digitally-printed products; from concept and design through to manufacturing and installation. We are very passionate about what we do; our consultants, project managers and planners, offering a bespoke service from supply only to a fully experienced, safe and insured installation service. Having heavily invested in state-of-the-art printing technology, we are able to produce high quality print of any size on a range of fabrics. This, combined with our personal, proactive and professional service, allows us to offer support and peace of mind, delivering epic results every time! For more information go to www.hollywoodmonster.co.uk

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Polymark Group

Rua da Chã 30, Paião, Figueira da Foz, PT, 3090-495
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Polymark Group is a specialist in (heat) transfers, emblems, and labels for the decoration of workwear, corporate clothing, sportswear, and promotional products. Polymark Group also develops helmet stickers and labels for the identification and coding of textiles, such as name labels, barcode labels, and company logos. Polymark’s products are produced in an environmentally friendly manner and are GOTS and Oeko-Tex certified. Thanks to our mastery of the latest digital and screen printing technologies, there is virtually no limit to the creativity, colors, or complexity of the designs we can print. For 70 years, the name Polymark has been synonymous with quality and service. Our brands: Polytrans, Ultratrans Plus, Duotrans Plus, Decotrans Plus, Easytrans, Ultratrans Flex, Duotrans Flex, Decotrans Flex, Reflective, Ultrareflect, Ultraprint, Thermark, and Thermark Ultra. Polymark’s customers enjoy doing business with us because of our high-quality products, our focus on sustainable processes and products, our reliable and fast delivery process, and our expert customer service. Polymark Group Benelux is part of the Polymark Group. The Polymark Group is headquartered in Portugal and has offices in Germany, France, the UK, and Italy. We identify with your quality! Our commitment to continuous development ensures that we are focused on constantly improving and evolving our range, utilising the latest products and technologies to ensure that we can help our customers remain competitive in today’s challenging markets.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hollywood-monster.jpeg
Hollywood Monster
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polymark-gb-limited.jpeg
Polymark Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hollywood Monster
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Polymark Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hollywood Monster in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Polymark Group in 2025.

Incident History — Hollywood Monster (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hollywood Monster cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Polymark Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Polymark Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hollywood-monster.jpeg
Hollywood Monster
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polymark-gb-limited.jpeg
Polymark Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hollywood Monster company and Polymark Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Polymark Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hollywood Monster company.

In the current year, Polymark Group company and Hollywood Monster company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Polymark Group company nor Hollywood Monster company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Polymark Group company nor Hollywood Monster company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Polymark Group company nor Hollywood Monster company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hollywood Monster company nor Polymark Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hollywood Monster nor Polymark Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hollywood Monster company nor Polymark Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hollywood Monster company employs more people globally than Polymark Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Hollywood Monster nor Polymark Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hollywood Monster nor Polymark Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hollywood Monster nor Polymark Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hollywood Monster nor Polymark Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hollywood Monster nor Polymark Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hollywood Monster nor Polymark Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L