Comparison Overview

Holley's Printing

VS

ThinkShapes Mail

Holley's Printing

955 West College Street, Pulaski, TN, 38478, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Holley's Printing is a family-owned and operated business serving this region since 1961. For nearly six decades, Holley’s has progressed with the tremendous changes in the printing industry. What began with handset type on a traditional letterpress transitioned to high-speed presses and has moved forward with quicker than ever digital and wide format services. Our friendly staff and sales team is here to offer solutions and produce the materials your business needs for success. We work closely together as a team to ensure your deadlines are met and that you, our customers, are happy. A quality product and customer satisfaction are our ultimate goals. From graphic design and printing to a multitude of post-press finishes such as high gloss UV coating, foil stamping, bindery, and mailing services, Holley’s Printing will guide you through every step of the production process here at our Pulaski facility. Whether you need labels, forms, brochures, vinyl banners, metal signs, or promotional items, Holley's Printing is your FULL-SERVICE printer. We appreciate your business and look forward to making your next printing experience as easy as possible!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ThinkShapes Mail

None
Last Update: 2025-12-14

ThinkShapes Mail is a digital printer who specializes in shaped mail and shaped collateral projects and campaigns, as well as digital printing and direct mail fulfillment. Shaped mail, also called Customized MarketMail (or CMM), has been proven to increase response rates by as much as 300%. Yes, 300%! Compare that with traditional direct mail, which on a good day nets about a 2% return, and ThinkShapes Mail wins hands down.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holley's-printing.jpeg
Holley's Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thinkshapes-mail.jpeg
ThinkShapes Mail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Holley's Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ThinkShapes Mail
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holley's Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ThinkShapes Mail in 2025.

Incident History — Holley's Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holley's Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ThinkShapes Mail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ThinkShapes Mail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holley's-printing.jpeg
Holley's Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thinkshapes-mail.jpeg
ThinkShapes Mail
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ThinkShapes Mail company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Holley's Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ThinkShapes Mail company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Holley's Printing company.

In the current year, ThinkShapes Mail company and Holley's Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ThinkShapes Mail company nor Holley's Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ThinkShapes Mail company nor Holley's Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ThinkShapes Mail company nor Holley's Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Holley's Printing company nor ThinkShapes Mail company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Holley's Printing nor ThinkShapes Mail holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Holley's Printing company nor ThinkShapes Mail company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Holley's Printing company employs more people globally than ThinkShapes Mail company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Holley's Printing nor ThinkShapes Mail holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Holley's Printing nor ThinkShapes Mail holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Holley's Printing nor ThinkShapes Mail holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Holley's Printing nor ThinkShapes Mail holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Holley's Printing nor ThinkShapes Mail holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Holley's Printing nor ThinkShapes Mail holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L