Comparison Overview

hollandridderkerk

VS

Wizard Labels

hollandridderkerk

De Zelling 17, Hendrik-Ido-Ambacht, South Holland, NL, 3342 GS
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hollandridderkerk.nl

Hollandridderkerk is specialist in Printing On Demand, digitaal drukwerk en grootformaat prints. Daarbij verlenen wij allerlei aanvullende diensten zoals creatieve vormgeving, slimme automatisering en fulfilment. Wij staan voor bestelgemak, duurzaamheid en persoonlijke service. Of u nu opleider, uitgever, marketeer of retailer bent, bij Hollandridderkerk bent u voor al uw druk- en printwerk aan het juiste adres. Van enkele afdrukken tot volledige outsourcing.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Wizard Labels

undefined, New Albany, IN, 47150, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wizardlabels.com

Wizard Labels produces the highest quality digitally printed custom product labels across a multitude of product segments, using the latest and greatest digital printers. Wizard Labels is not "just another label printing company."​ Its owners are some of the best-known faces in digital label printing in North America and are recognized pioneers in the early adoption of digital label technology. They are frequent guest speakers at industry conferences across the globe where they share their knowledge and experience in the introduction of digital technology to product label printing. They formed Wizard Labels specifically to provide an internet-based platform for small and medium businesses to manage their custom product label needs in the most user-friendly and painless way possible. By combining no-pressure customer-friendly service with market-leading prices and super-speedy fulfillment, Wizard Labels moves the goalposts in the custom product label printing sector. Testimonials: "Just wanted to drop you a note. We are a retail and wholesale company and deal with vendors and customers everyday. Most of the time vendors are very unhelpful and a chore to work with and don't follow through without us doing most of the work for them. It was very very refreshing working with your company. Your customer service was Excellent!!" -Bill (Murrieta, CA) "Thanks for the excellent service! We received our labels on Monday, two days earlier than expected. And, they look great. Looking forward to printing with you again!" -Aimee (Ft Lauderdale, FL) "We received our order, and are so pleased with not only the speed with which we were able to get the labels, but the high quality of the labels themselves. They are beautiful! We look forward to doing more business in the future." -J.Y. (Pound Ridge, NY)

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hollandridderkerk.jpeg
hollandridderkerk
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wizard-labels.jpeg
Wizard Labels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
hollandridderkerk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wizard Labels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for hollandridderkerk in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wizard Labels in 2025.

Incident History — hollandridderkerk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

hollandridderkerk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wizard Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wizard Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hollandridderkerk.jpeg
hollandridderkerk
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wizard-labels.jpeg
Wizard Labels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both hollandridderkerk company and Wizard Labels company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Wizard Labels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to hollandridderkerk company.

In the current year, Wizard Labels company and hollandridderkerk company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wizard Labels company nor hollandridderkerk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wizard Labels company nor hollandridderkerk company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wizard Labels company nor hollandridderkerk company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither hollandridderkerk company nor Wizard Labels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither hollandridderkerk nor Wizard Labels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither hollandridderkerk company nor Wizard Labels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

hollandridderkerk company employs more people globally than Wizard Labels company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither hollandridderkerk nor Wizard Labels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither hollandridderkerk nor Wizard Labels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither hollandridderkerk nor Wizard Labels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither hollandridderkerk nor Wizard Labels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither hollandridderkerk nor Wizard Labels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither hollandridderkerk nor Wizard Labels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References