Comparison Overview

Holland Rijnland

VS

Municipalidad de San Francisco

Holland Rijnland

Schuttersveld 9, Leiden, 2316XG, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Holland Rijnland is een regio in het hart van de Randstad. Hier werken dertien gemeenten samen om wonen, werken en welzijn van inwoners te verbeteren. In het noorden van Zuid-Holland liggen de gemeenten Alphen aan den Rijn, Hillegom, Kaag en Braassem, Katwijk, Leiden, Leiderdorp, Lisse, Nieuwkoop, Noordwijk, Oegstgeest, Teylingen, Voorschoten en Zoeterwoude. Samen vormen wij de regio Holland Rijnland. En als regio werken we samen in de gelijknamige organisatie Holland Rijnland. Door de handen ineen te slaan, brengen we de regio verder op het gebied van wonen, werken, onderwijs, energie, mobiliteit en recreatie. Onze Regionale Investeringsagenda bevat gezamenlijke projecten die bijdragen aan vier thema’s: bereikbaar en verbonden, economisch sterk en innovatief, duurzaam en energiezeker en groen en klimaatbestendig. Via deze investeringsagenda brengen we projecten stapsgewijs naar een volgende fase. Uitvoerende taken Naast het maken en uitwerken van strategische keuzes, draagt Holland Rijnland zorg voor een aantal uitvoerende taken. Met het Regionaal Bureau Leerrecht (RBL) zetten we ons actief in om schoolverzuim tegen te gaan en schooluitval te voorkomen. Dat doen we met elf regiogemeenten. Ieder kind heeft recht op onderwijs. Dat maakt het werk van het RBL zo belangrijk. Een opleiding bereidt jongeren voor op hun rol in de samenleving én vergroot hun kansen op de arbeidsmarkt. Ook beheren we het contract voor de Regiotaxi. Dit is een aanvulling op het bestaande openbaar vervoer waarvan iedereen gebruik kan maken. Verder ondersteunen we de urgentiecommissie die woningzoekenden in moeilijke omstandigheden voorrang kan verlenen bij het toekennen van een sociale huurwoning.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 110
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Municipalidad de San Francisco

2400, AR
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Página informativa sobre los acontecimientos actuales realizados desde la Municipalidad en la ciudadanía e información sobre las diferentes areas involucradas en la gestión con sus respectivas funciones y noticias que involucren a las mismas y tengan impacto sobre los habitantes, como así también datos sobre empresas locales y plano de la ciudad. Permite a los ciudadanos realizar diferentes consultas y reclamos, a través de mensajes de texto, dirigidos al area correspondiente.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 690
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holland-rijnland.jpeg
Holland Rijnland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Municipalidad de San Francisco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Holland Rijnland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Municipalidad de San Francisco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holland Rijnland in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Municipalidad de San Francisco in 2025.

Incident History — Holland Rijnland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holland Rijnland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Municipalidad de San Francisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Municipalidad de San Francisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holland-rijnland.jpeg
Holland Rijnland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Municipalidad de San Francisco
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Municipalidad de San Francisco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Holland Rijnland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Municipalidad de San Francisco company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Holland Rijnland company.

In the current year, Municipalidad de San Francisco company and Holland Rijnland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Municipalidad de San Francisco company nor Holland Rijnland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Municipalidad de San Francisco company nor Holland Rijnland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Municipalidad de San Francisco company nor Holland Rijnland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Holland Rijnland company nor Municipalidad de San Francisco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Holland Rijnland nor Municipalidad de San Francisco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Holland Rijnland company nor Municipalidad de San Francisco company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Municipalidad de San Francisco company employs more people globally than Holland Rijnland company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Holland Rijnland nor Municipalidad de San Francisco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Holland Rijnland nor Municipalidad de San Francisco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Holland Rijnland nor Municipalidad de San Francisco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Holland Rijnland nor Municipalidad de San Francisco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Holland Rijnland nor Municipalidad de San Francisco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Holland Rijnland nor Municipalidad de San Francisco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N