Comparison Overview

Holeigh J Skyler Foundation

VS

Utah Foundation

Holeigh J Skyler Foundation

undefined, Lantana, TX, 76226, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Holeigh J. Skyler Foundation is a 501(c)3 non-profit corporation founded in the Heart of Texas, to honor our fallen friends. The foundation was established to encourage and foster the performing arts, promote scientific inquiry, and facilitate community. We are also dedicated to training and developing the next generation of leaders that will continue conducting such activities, and we are committed to the acquisition and dissemination of knowledge in relation to our mission.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Utah Foundation

10 W Broadway, Salt Lake City, 84101, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Utah Foundation’s mission is to produce objective, thorough and well-reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for Utahns. Utah Foundation seeks to help decision-makers and citizens understand and address complex issues. Utah Foundation also offers constructive guidance to improve governmental policies, programs and structures. Utah Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit research organization.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holeigh-j.-skyler-foundation.jpeg
Holeigh J Skyler Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utah-foundation.jpeg
Utah Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Holeigh J Skyler Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Utah Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holeigh J Skyler Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Utah Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Holeigh J Skyler Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holeigh J Skyler Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Utah Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Utah Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holeigh-j.-skyler-foundation.jpeg
Holeigh J Skyler Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utah-foundation.jpeg
Utah Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Holeigh J Skyler Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Utah Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Utah Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Holeigh J Skyler Foundation company.

In the current year, Utah Foundation company and Holeigh J Skyler Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Utah Foundation company nor Holeigh J Skyler Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Utah Foundation company nor Holeigh J Skyler Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Utah Foundation company nor Holeigh J Skyler Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Holeigh J Skyler Foundation company nor Utah Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Holeigh J Skyler Foundation nor Utah Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Holeigh J Skyler Foundation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Utah Foundation company.

Utah Foundation company employs more people globally than Holeigh J Skyler Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Holeigh J Skyler Foundation nor Utah Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Holeigh J Skyler Foundation nor Utah Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Holeigh J Skyler Foundation nor Utah Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Holeigh J Skyler Foundation nor Utah Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Holeigh J Skyler Foundation nor Utah Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Holeigh J Skyler Foundation nor Utah Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X