Comparison Overview

Holding & Co. Photography

VS

Queensberry

Holding & Co. Photography

211 West Emporia Street, Ontario, CA, 91762-3844, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14

Co-Founder and Photographer for Holding & Co. Photography, one of Southern California's premiere photography studios. Based in Southern California, we are a husband & wife photography duo specializing in creative, modern documentary wedding and portrait photography. We feel so blessed to be serving the most joyful and in-love couples in all of Southern California including; Orange County, Los Angeles, the Inland Empire and San Diego areas. Our photography style is timeless, creative, photo-journalistic and dramatic. However, our style is only a part of what we provide, we strive to give you a great experience as well. We're both very silly, fun and energetic people. If you book with us, you can bet you're going to laugh, have fun and be relaxed - allowing you to be yourselves in front of our camera, so that we capture not just you... but, the real you.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Queensberry

Auckland City, NZ
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 800 and 849

CELEBRATE YOUR STORY We all have unique stories to tell: events that shaped us, special times that define who we are. Our memories give our life meaning – and yet they fade over time. Queensberry makes your special memories unforgettable by crafting them into beautiful books, albums, boxes and wall-art to reflect with, enjoy and share forever. Your most special days, and the photographers who capture them, have been our reason for being for more than forty years.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holding-&-co.-photography.jpeg
Holding & Co. Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/queensberry.jpeg
Queensberry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Holding & Co. Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Queensberry
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holding & Co. Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Queensberry in 2025.

Incident History — Holding & Co. Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holding & Co. Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Queensberry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Queensberry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holding-&-co.-photography.jpeg
Holding & Co. Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/queensberry.jpeg
Queensberry
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Queensberry company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Holding & Co. Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Queensberry company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Holding & Co. Photography company.

In the current year, Queensberry company and Holding & Co. Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Queensberry company nor Holding & Co. Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Queensberry company nor Holding & Co. Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Queensberry company nor Holding & Co. Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Holding & Co. Photography company nor Queensberry company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Holding & Co. Photography nor Queensberry holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Queensberry company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Holding & Co. Photography company.

Queensberry company employs more people globally than Holding & Co. Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Holding & Co. Photography nor Queensberry holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Holding & Co. Photography nor Queensberry holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Holding & Co. Photography nor Queensberry holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Holding & Co. Photography nor Queensberry holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Holding & Co. Photography nor Queensberry holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Holding & Co. Photography nor Queensberry holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N