Comparison Overview

Holcim

VS

Knauf

Holcim

Grafenauweg 10, Zug, undefined, 6300 , CH
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

What world do you want to live in? A world with greener cities? Powered by renewable energy? Connected with green mobility? With housing for all? If you're passionate about innovation and sustainability, you believe in the power of collaboration and diversity, and you want to learn, grow and perform at your best... ...Join us. And build a world we all want to live in. Greener, smarter and for all. Together we are Builders of Progress. Build progress with us > holcim.com/careers

NAICS: 4233
NAICS Definition: Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees: 45,523
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Knauf

Am Bahnhof 7, Iphofen, undefined, D-97346, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

Everyone sees opportunity differently. Knauf sees opportunity in everyone. Similar to other global businesses, our 41,500 team members in 90 countries across 300 sites provide a huge opportunity for anyone with ambition and energy. Unlike other global businesses, you may be surprised that Knauf is still a family-owned and run company and that means that our values and people-first culture are at the forefront of how the business operates. This means that career with us can offer you something a bit special; family values at the heart combined with global success and influence. Founded in 1932, we are one of the world’s leading manufacturers of construction materials for interior design, building insulation, and design ceilings. We are made up of 4 core divisions and our plants across the globe produce state-of-the-art drywall systems, plasters, and insulating materials as well as external thermal insulation composite systems.

NAICS: 4233
NAICS Definition: Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees: 11,662
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holcim.jpeg
Holcim
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/knauf.jpeg
Knauf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Holcim
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Knauf
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holcim in 2025.

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Knauf in 2025.

Incident History — Holcim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holcim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Knauf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Knauf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holcim.jpeg
Holcim
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/knauf.jpeg
Knauf
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Holcim company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Knauf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Knauf company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Holcim company has not reported any.

In the current year, Knauf company and Holcim company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Knauf company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Holcim company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Knauf company nor Holcim company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Knauf company nor Holcim company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Holcim company nor Knauf company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Holcim nor Knauf holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Knauf company and Holcim company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Holcim company employs more people globally than Knauf company, reflecting its scale as a Wholesale Building Materials.

Neither Holcim nor Knauf holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Holcim nor Knauf holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Holcim nor Knauf holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Holcim nor Knauf holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Holcim nor Knauf holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Holcim nor Knauf holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N