Comparison Overview

Holcim

VS

Carrier

Holcim

Grafenauweg 10, Zug, undefined, 6300 , CH
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.holcim.com/

What world do you want to live in? A world with greener cities? Powered by renewable energy? Connected with green mobility? With housing for all? If you're passionate about innovation and sustainability, you believe in the power of collaboration and diversity, and you want to learn, grow and perform at your best... ...Join us. And build a world we all want to live in. Greener, smarter and for all. Together we are Builders of Progress. Build progress with us > holcim.com/careers

NAICS: 4233
NAICS Definition: Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees: 45,523
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Carrier

13995 Pasteur Blvd, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 33418, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.corporate.carrier.com/

Carrier Global Corporation, global leader in intelligent climate and energy solutions, is committed to making the world safer, sustainable and more comfortable for generations to come. From the beginning, we’ve led in inventing new technologies and entirely new industries. Today, we continue to lead because we have a world-class, diverse workforce that puts the customer at the center of everything we do. For more information, visit www.Corporate.Carrier.com.

NAICS: 4233
NAICS Definition: Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees: 20,398
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holcim.jpeg
Holcim
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carrier.jpeg
Carrier
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Holcim
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Carrier
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holcim in 2025.

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carrier in 2025.

Incident History — Holcim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holcim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Carrier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carrier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holcim.jpeg
Holcim
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carrier.jpeg
Carrier
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Holcim company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Carrier company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Carrier company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Holcim company.

In the current year, Carrier company and Holcim company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Carrier company nor Holcim company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Carrier company nor Holcim company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Carrier company nor Holcim company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Holcim company nor Carrier company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Holcim nor Carrier holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Carrier company and Holcim company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Holcim company employs more people globally than Carrier company, reflecting its scale as a Wholesale Building Materials.

Neither Holcim nor Carrier holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Holcim nor Carrier holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Holcim nor Carrier holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Holcim nor Carrier holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Holcim nor Carrier holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Holcim nor Carrier holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References