Comparison Overview

Holcim

VS

Ambuja Cements Limited

Holcim

Grafenauweg 10, Zug, undefined, 6300 , CH
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

What world do you want to live in? A world with greener cities? Powered by renewable energy? Connected with green mobility? With housing for all? If you're passionate about innovation and sustainability, you believe in the power of collaboration and diversity, and you want to learn, grow and perform at your best... ...Join us. And build a world we all want to live in. Greener, smarter and for all. Together we are Builders of Progress. Build progress with us > holcim.com/careers

NAICS: 4233
NAICS Definition: Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees: 45,523
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ambuja Cements Limited

Elegant Business Park, Off Andheri Kurla Road,, MIDC Cross Road "B"​, Andheri (East),, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400059
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Ambuja Cements Ltd. is among the leading cement companies in India. It is a member of the Adani Group - the largest and fastest-growing portfolio of diversified sustainable businesses. Ambuja Cement is known for its hassle-free, home-building solutions. Its unique products tailor-made for Indian climatic conditions, sustainable operations and initiatives that advance the company's philosophy of contributing to the larger good of the society have made it the most trusted brand in the Indian cement industry.

NAICS: 4233
NAICS Definition: Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees: 12,028
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holcim.jpeg
Holcim
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ambuja-cements-ltd.jpeg
Ambuja Cements Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Holcim
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ambuja Cements Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holcim in 2025.

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ambuja Cements Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Holcim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holcim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ambuja Cements Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ambuja Cements Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holcim.jpeg
Holcim
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ambuja-cements-ltd.jpeg
Ambuja Cements Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Holcim company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ambuja Cements Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ambuja Cements Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Holcim company.

In the current year, Ambuja Cements Limited company and Holcim company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ambuja Cements Limited company nor Holcim company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ambuja Cements Limited company nor Holcim company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ambuja Cements Limited company nor Holcim company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Holcim company nor Ambuja Cements Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Holcim nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Holcim company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ambuja Cements Limited company.

Holcim company employs more people globally than Ambuja Cements Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Wholesale Building Materials.

Neither Holcim nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Holcim nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Holcim nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Holcim nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Holcim nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Holcim nor Ambuja Cements Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N