Comparison Overview

HOCHTIEF

VS

Bouygues Group

HOCHTIEF

Alfredstr. 236, Essen, 45133, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Building means shaping. Buildings change our world. The Gotthard Tunnel in Switzerland, roads, bridges, office or residential buildings, sports facilities and cultural centers such as the Elbe Philharmonic Hall in Hamburg or Madison Square Garden in New York: HOCHTIEF creates living spaces. And it has been doing so all over the world for more than 100 years. Our thinking and our actions are value-driven: We stand for integrity, reliability, innovation, results orientation, and sustainability. The knowledge, dedication and commitment of our employees are the basis for our success. With us, you will find challenging and fulfilling jobs. Our vision: HOCHTIEF is building the world of tomorrow. If you would like to build the world of tomorrow with us, apply here on the HOCHTIEF job portal: https://www.hochtief.de/karriere/jobboerse. Imprint: https://www.hochtief.com/imprint

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 2,669
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bouygues Group

32, Avenue Hoche, None, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75008
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1952 by Francis Bouygues, Bouygues is a diversified services group operating in over 80 countries with 200,000 employees all working to make life better every day. Its business activities in construction (Bouygues Construction, Bouygues Immobilier, Colas); energies & services (Equans); media (TF1) and telecoms (Bouygues Telecom) are able to drive growth since they all satisfy constantly changing and essential needs.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 27,647
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hochtief.jpeg
HOCHTIEF
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bouygues.jpeg
Bouygues Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HOCHTIEF
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bouygues Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HOCHTIEF in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

Bouygues Group has 17.65% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — HOCHTIEF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HOCHTIEF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bouygues Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bouygues Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hochtief.jpeg
HOCHTIEF
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bouygues.jpeg
Bouygues Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

HOCHTIEF company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bouygues Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bouygues Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas HOCHTIEF company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bouygues Group company has reported more cyber incidents than HOCHTIEF company.

Neither Bouygues Group company nor HOCHTIEF company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Bouygues Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while HOCHTIEF company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bouygues Group company nor HOCHTIEF company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither HOCHTIEF company nor Bouygues Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither HOCHTIEF nor Bouygues Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bouygues Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to HOCHTIEF company.

Bouygues Group company employs more people globally than HOCHTIEF company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither HOCHTIEF nor Bouygues Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HOCHTIEF nor Bouygues Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HOCHTIEF nor Bouygues Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HOCHTIEF nor Bouygues Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HOCHTIEF nor Bouygues Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HOCHTIEF nor Bouygues Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H