Comparison Overview

Hoboken Historical Museum

VS

Saunders Finger Lakes Museum

Hoboken Historical Museum

1301 Hudson St., Hoboken, NJ, 07030, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Hoboken Museum documents Hoboken's physical and cultural heritage, which has local, regional, and national significance. By collecting, preserving, and interpreting artifacts and oral histories, the Museum serves the community of Hoboken and all those who enjoy its history and culture. We offer historical walking-tour maps and a map of significant sites in Frank Sinatra's life in Hoboken. We also offer Hoboken-themed merchandise: Books, t-shirts, mugs, prints and more. The Hoboken Museum staffs the Hoboken Fire Department Museum, 213 Bloomfield St., on Saturdays & Sundays from 12 - 5 pm. The Museum is open six days a week (Tues-Thurs 2 - 7 pm; Fri 1 - 5 pm; Sat - Sun 12 - 5 pm) in one of the oldest buildings on the Hoboken waterfront, a former Bethlehem Steel shipyard, 1301 Hudson St. Phone number: 201-656-2240. Admission is just $4. The Museum is a 501c3 nonprofit organization, founded in 1986.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Saunders Finger Lakes Museum

3368 Guyanoga Road, Branchport, New York, 14418, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Nestled in the heart of it all on the north end of Keuka Lake, the Saunders Finger Lakes Museum stirs the imagination, educates the mind, and inspires visitors of all ages. Our goal is to bring the unique cultural heritage and natural history of the Finger Lakes directly to you. Let us show you why we're not your average museum. Situated on a 30-acre site with wetland trails, kayak and canoe livery, and outdoor exhibits, we offer paddling excursions and cultural and natural history educational programming. Learn more at www.FingerLakesMuseum.org, or www.facebook.com/FLMuseum, or call us at 315-595-2200.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hoboken-historical-museum-and-cultural-center.jpeg
Hoboken Historical Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finger-lakes-museum.jpeg
Saunders Finger Lakes Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hoboken Historical Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Saunders Finger Lakes Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hoboken Historical Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saunders Finger Lakes Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Hoboken Historical Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hoboken Historical Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Saunders Finger Lakes Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saunders Finger Lakes Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hoboken-historical-museum-and-cultural-center.jpeg
Hoboken Historical Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finger-lakes-museum.jpeg
Saunders Finger Lakes Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hoboken Historical Museum company and Saunders Finger Lakes Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Saunders Finger Lakes Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hoboken Historical Museum company.

In the current year, Saunders Finger Lakes Museum company and Hoboken Historical Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Saunders Finger Lakes Museum company nor Hoboken Historical Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Saunders Finger Lakes Museum company nor Hoboken Historical Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Saunders Finger Lakes Museum company nor Hoboken Historical Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hoboken Historical Museum company nor Saunders Finger Lakes Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hoboken Historical Museum nor Saunders Finger Lakes Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hoboken Historical Museum company nor Saunders Finger Lakes Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Saunders Finger Lakes Museum company employs more people globally than Hoboken Historical Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Hoboken Historical Museum nor Saunders Finger Lakes Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hoboken Historical Museum nor Saunders Finger Lakes Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hoboken Historical Museum nor Saunders Finger Lakes Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hoboken Historical Museum nor Saunders Finger Lakes Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hoboken Historical Museum nor Saunders Finger Lakes Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hoboken Historical Museum nor Saunders Finger Lakes Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X