Comparison Overview

The University of Hong Kong Libraries

VS

BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project

The University of Hong Kong Libraries

Library Building, Main, Pok Fu Lam Rd, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, undefined, undefined, HK
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The University of Hong Kong Libraries is an essential part of the educational facilities provided to you by the University. The Libraries advances the teaching and learning, research, and knowledge exchange pursuits of the University through its outstanding resources, people-centred services as well as its innovative and collaborative approaches. The Libraries consists of the Main Library and six branch libraries, namely the Dental Library, Fung Ping Shan Library, Lui Che Woo Law Library, Music Library, Tin Ka Ping Education Library, and the Yu Chun Keung Medical Library. Of scholarly interest is Special Collections which houses a unique collection of Hong Kong materials, rare books, pamphlets, and microforms. The Main Library and the six branches are located across the University, https://lib.hku.hk/general/location/index.html. Established in October 1912 and located in two rooms in The University of Hong Kong’s Main Building with a floor area of about 288 square meters plus a small Medical section in the Pathology Building. Today, the collections of The University of Hong Kong Libraries exceed 3.1 million volumes, 7.4 million e-books, 479,000 e-Journal subscriptions and titles and 938 e-Databases. Fung Ping Shan Library was established in 1932 as the University's Chinese library through a generous donation by the late Mr Fung Ping Shan. Construction of the library began in 1929. It was completed three years later and was officially opened on 14 December 1932 by Sir William Peel, then Governor of Hong Kong. In 1961, Fung Ping Shan Library moved into the Main Library building and, with the consent of the Fung Family, the original library premises were converted into the Fung Ping Shan Museum.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project

PO Box 21206, Charleston, South Carolina, 29413, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Through Lyrasis (a non-profit, community-focused membership organization), our community engagement tools help support libraries and their community to create, share, and discover local content. Create. Whether it is a multimedia collection or a professional-quality eBook, tools like Creator and Pressbooks Public help your library create unique local content, by and for your community. Share. Use Custom Submission Pages to invite patrons to share content for your library’s community collections. Encourage your local writing community to share their ebooks with the Indie Author Project to gain new readership and exposure through the library. Discover. With geolocation authentication, your patrons can have instant access to all of your BiblioBoard Library content in an unlimited, simultaneous-use environment.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hkulibrary.jpeg
The University of Hong Kong Libraries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bibliolabs.jpeg
BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The University of Hong Kong Libraries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Hong Kong Libraries in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project in 2025.

Incident History — The University of Hong Kong Libraries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Hong Kong Libraries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hkulibrary.jpeg
The University of Hong Kong Libraries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bibliolabs.jpeg
BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The University of Hong Kong Libraries company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The University of Hong Kong Libraries company.

In the current year, BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company and The University of Hong Kong Libraries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company nor The University of Hong Kong Libraries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company nor The University of Hong Kong Libraries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company nor The University of Hong Kong Libraries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The University of Hong Kong Libraries company nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The University of Hong Kong Libraries nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The University of Hong Kong Libraries company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company.

The University of Hong Kong Libraries company employs more people globally than BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither The University of Hong Kong Libraries nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The University of Hong Kong Libraries nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The University of Hong Kong Libraries nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The University of Hong Kong Libraries nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The University of Hong Kong Libraries nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The University of Hong Kong Libraries nor BiblioBoard + Indie Author Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H