Comparison Overview

HKLIVING

VS

Evostyle

HKLIVING

De Dieze 2, Dronten, 8253, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

HKliving is a Dutch interior brand founded bij Emiel Hetsen and Sander Klaver. The initials of both their last names have been used to create the brand name HKliving. The combination of a creative mind and a mathematical brain has turned out to be a winning formula. At the base HKliving creates accessible collections with products inspired by traditional and useable designs while respecting its history, but always to give it a modern look and feel. During the desiging process the emphasis has been placed on honoring the original style/influence, but very much creating accesible items at the same time. The Headquarters of HKliving is based in Dronten, the Netherlands. This is also where our main warehouse is located. Next to this we have distribution centers in Australia, USA and China to supply our retailers worldwide. Our collections are available in 55 countries via our network of approximately 2.000 retailers.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Evostyle

2 Dowling Place, South Windsor, NSW, 2756, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Evostyle is a 100% Australian design and manufacturing company specialising in solid wood Architectural products and furniture for Architects, Specifiers and developers. We have worked on several significant projects over the years from the Athens Olympic Torches, bespoke furniture at AGNSW and special commissions. With short lead times, and expert craftsmanship built over three generations, Evostyle is the company of choice for people who know what they want, and expect quality and great customer service.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hkliving.jpeg
HKLIVING
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/evostyle.jpeg
Evostyle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HKLIVING
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Evostyle
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HKLIVING in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Evostyle in 2025.

Incident History — HKLIVING (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HKLIVING cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Evostyle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Evostyle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hkliving.jpeg
HKLIVING
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/evostyle.jpeg
Evostyle
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

HKLIVING company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Evostyle company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Evostyle company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to HKLIVING company.

In the current year, Evostyle company and HKLIVING company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Evostyle company nor HKLIVING company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Evostyle company nor HKLIVING company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Evostyle company nor HKLIVING company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither HKLIVING company nor Evostyle company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither HKLIVING nor Evostyle holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither HKLIVING company nor Evostyle company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

HKLIVING company employs more people globally than Evostyle company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither HKLIVING nor Evostyle holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HKLIVING nor Evostyle holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HKLIVING nor Evostyle holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HKLIVING nor Evostyle holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HKLIVING nor Evostyle holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HKLIVING nor Evostyle holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.