Comparison Overview

Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P.

VS

Bugden & Isaacson, LLC

Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P.

100 N. Broadway, Wichita, Kansas, 67226, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Hite, Fanning & Honeyman is a premier litigation and business law firm known for its dedication to client service and legal excellence. With a team of experienced professionals, the firm offers comprehensive legal solutions in multiple practice areas. This firm's mission is to provide superior counsel, responsive client care, creative, pragmatic, timely, and cost effective solutions to our clients. We aim to earn our clients'​ loyalty by recognizing their goals and working with them to achieve those goals. Our practice areas include: Aerospace & Aviation Appellate Banking Bankruptcy and Insolvency Business and Commercial Litigation Construction & Engineering Business Transactions, Finance and Corporate Governance Domestic and Family Law Government Liability Health Care Litigation Insurance Labor and Employment Litigation Mediation Oil, Gas and other Personal Services Energy Sources Products Liability Workers Compensation

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bugden & Isaacson, LLC

445 East 200 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Bugden & Isaacson, LLC, is a Utah based law firm with offices in Salt Lake City and Park City. The firm is known for providing clients throughout the state of Utah with quality legal representation in criminal and administrative matters. Our experienced attorneys represent criminal defendants facing a range of charges, including drug crimes, DUIs, and white collar crimes. We also capably handle an array of civil and administrative law matters, including police misconduct and professional licensing cases. At Bugden & Isaacson, our trial lawyers are known for taking on - and winning - tough, high-profile cases. We have a reputation among local judges and prosecutors for consistently demonstrating high-quality trial preparation and aggressive courtroom advocacy. In his over three decades of experience practicing law, partner Walter F. Bugden, Jr. has tried over 220 jury trials. In recognition of his work, national directory of attorneys Martindale-Hubbell has awarded him its coveted AV Preeminent rating, indicating preeminent legal ability and the highest ethical standards. Partner Tara L. Isaacson has been a criminal law attorney for over 16 years, obtaining acquittals in 31 jury trials, and has argued cases before the Utah Supreme Court and the Utah Court of Appeals.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hite-fanning-&-honeyman.jpeg
Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bugden-&-isaacson.jpeg
Bugden & Isaacson, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bugden & Isaacson, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bugden & Isaacson, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bugden & Isaacson, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bugden & Isaacson, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hite-fanning-&-honeyman.jpeg
Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bugden-&-isaacson.jpeg
Bugden & Isaacson, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bugden & Isaacson, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bugden & Isaacson, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. company.

In the current year, Bugden & Isaacson, LLC company and Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bugden & Isaacson, LLC company nor Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bugden & Isaacson, LLC company nor Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bugden & Isaacson, LLC company nor Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. company nor Bugden & Isaacson, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. nor Bugden & Isaacson, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. company nor Bugden & Isaacson, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. company employs more people globally than Bugden & Isaacson, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. nor Bugden & Isaacson, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. nor Bugden & Isaacson, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. nor Bugden & Isaacson, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. nor Bugden & Isaacson, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. nor Bugden & Isaacson, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hite, Fanning & Honeyman L.L.P. nor Bugden & Isaacson, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X