Comparison Overview

History Trust of South Australia

VS

Old World Wisconsin Foundation

History Trust of South Australia

233 North Tce, Adelaide, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The History Trust of South Australia is a statutory authority reporting to South Australian Parliament through the Minister for Education. It was established under the History Trust of South Australia Act (1981) to encourage the research and public presentation of South Australian history and to safeguard South Australia’s History Collection. The Trust manages three history museums – the Migration Museum, National Motor Museum and the South Australian Maritime Museum. Complementing these is The Centre for Democracy - an exciting collaboration with the State Library of South Australia. Our education programs provide opportunities for excursions, in-classroom and digital resources and professional development for teachers. In support of South Australia’s history network of committed volunteer associations and local history specialists, we manage a Community Museums Program and offer annual grants for research and writing to promote the value of history and our place in the world. Every year we present South Australia’s History Festival – a state-wide celebration of community history, collections and heritage. We present great community events such as the Bay to Birdwood vintage car run and other events, festivals and celebrations on South Australia’s cultural calendar. The History Trust of South Australia acknowledges the First Nations peoples of South Australia, whose connection to country and living cultures began in time immemorial and continues to the present. We affirm our commitment to advancing reconciliation.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Old World Wisconsin Foundation

undefined, P.O. Box 347 Elkhorn, WI, 53121, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Old World Wisconsin Foundation, also known as Old World Foundation, is an independent 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded in 1984 to support projects and programs at Old World Wisconsin, owned and operated by the Wisconsin Historical Society. Old World Foundation gratefully accepts donations from individuals, foundations, and corporations to provide additional support for Old World Wisconsin. Our foundation applies for grants, hosts fundraisers, and oversees endowment funds to benefit this treasured historic site. We are guided by a group of dedicated trustees who donate their time, talent, and treasure. Old World Wisconsin is a 600-acre outdoor living history attraction with over 100 animals (many are heritage breeds in danger of becoming extinct), 20 heirloom gardens, 60+ historic buildings and experienced facilitators and volunteers who bring history to life for over 50,000 guests each year. We would be honored if you would join us in celebrating the history of the Midwest by supporting Old World Wisconsin through Old World Foundation!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/history-sa.jpeg
History Trust of South Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-world-wisconsin-foundation.jpeg
Old World Wisconsin Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
History Trust of South Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Old World Wisconsin Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for History Trust of South Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Old World Wisconsin Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — History Trust of South Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

History Trust of South Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Old World Wisconsin Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Old World Wisconsin Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/history-sa.jpeg
History Trust of South Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-world-wisconsin-foundation.jpeg
Old World Wisconsin Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both History Trust of South Australia company and Old World Wisconsin Foundation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Old World Wisconsin Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to History Trust of South Australia company.

In the current year, Old World Wisconsin Foundation company and History Trust of South Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Old World Wisconsin Foundation company nor History Trust of South Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Old World Wisconsin Foundation company nor History Trust of South Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Old World Wisconsin Foundation company nor History Trust of South Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither History Trust of South Australia company nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither History Trust of South Australia nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither History Trust of South Australia company nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

History Trust of South Australia company employs more people globally than Old World Wisconsin Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither History Trust of South Australia nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither History Trust of South Australia nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither History Trust of South Australia nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither History Trust of South Australia nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither History Trust of South Australia nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither History Trust of South Australia nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X