Comparison Overview

DC History Center

VS

Heritage Preservation

DC History Center

801 K Street NW, Washington, DC, 20001, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dchistory.org

The DC History Center is a 501(c)(3) community-supported educational non-profit and research organization that deepens understanding of our city’s past to connect, empower, and inspire. We seek to reach into all eight Wards to preserve and elevate the stories of Washington’s diverse people, neighborhoods, and institutions. We will do this work as a welcoming and inclusive community that fosters curiosity and nurtures civic engagement to strengthen our city for all.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Heritage Preservation

None
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.heritagepreservation.org

Our Mission: To preserve the nation’s heritage for future generations through innovative leadership, education, and programs. Heritage Preservation is a national nonprofit dedicated to preserving the cultural, historic, and scientific heritage of the United States. By identifying risks, developing innovative programs, and providing broad public access to expert advice, Heritage Preservation assists the museums, libraries, archives, organizations, and individuals that care for our endangered heritage.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-washington-d-c-.jpeg
DC History Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-preservation.jpeg
Heritage Preservation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DC History Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Heritage Preservation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DC History Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heritage Preservation in 2026.

Incident History — DC History Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DC History Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Heritage Preservation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heritage Preservation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-washington-d-c-.jpeg
DC History Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-preservation.jpeg
Heritage Preservation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Heritage Preservation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DC History Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Heritage Preservation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DC History Center company.

In the current year, Heritage Preservation company and DC History Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Heritage Preservation company nor DC History Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Heritage Preservation company nor DC History Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Heritage Preservation company nor DC History Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DC History Center company nor Heritage Preservation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DC History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DC History Center company nor Heritage Preservation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DC History Center company employs more people globally than Heritage Preservation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither DC History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DC History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DC History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DC History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DC History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DC History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References