Comparison Overview

Historical Society of the New York Courts

VS

Florida Museum of Natural History

Historical Society of the New York Courts

140 Grand Street, Suite 701, None, White Plains, New York, US, 10601
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://history.nycourts.gov/

The Historical Society of the New York Courts was founded in 2002 by then New York State Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye. Its mission is to preserve, protect and promote the legal history of New York, including the proud heritage of its courts and the development of the Rule of Law. The Society promotes its mission through educational outreach to New York State students, and public programs and publications on these themes which inform our knowledge and role as citizens today. The Society supports its programs through contributions from its members, gifts and grants from foundations, corporations, law firms and individuals. The Society is recognized as a (501)(c)(3) organization by the Internal Revenue Service.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Florida Museum of Natural History

3215 Hull Road, Gainesville, Florida, 32611-2710, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu

The Florida Museum of Natural History inspires people to value the biological richness and cultural heritage of our diverse world and make a positive difference in its future. The museum is based on the University of Florida campus in Gainesville, with research sites throughout the world. It is Florida's official state natural history museum and one of the nation’s largest and fastest-growing natural history museums, including one of the world's largest collections of butterflies and moths. --- The Florida Museum of Natural History intends to educate, inform and provide updated information on its activities and to support and promote its objectives for these activities through its Facebook page. All Florida Museum comments are made by Museum designees. This site is not a public forum. Social media users may share ideas through commentary that is consistent with and furthers the objectives of the Museum and the University of Florida. The Museum reserves the right to remove any comments that do not fall within this purpose, including those that are: off-topic, containing links to third-party websites or content, or made in violation of Florida or federal law. By posting a comment on our social media pages, you agree to follow the University of Florida Community Commenting Guidelines, host social media channel Terms of Service, Florida and federal law, and UF regulations and policies – including but not limited to the university’s Acceptable Use of Computing Resources Policy. Your comments may be removed if they are in violation of these guidelines.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 223
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-the-ny-courts.jpeg
Historical Society of the New York Courts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
Florida Museum of Natural History
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historical Society of the New York Courts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Florida Museum of Natural History
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historical Society of the New York Courts in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Museum of Natural History in 2026.

Incident History — Historical Society of the New York Courts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historical Society of the New York Courts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Florida Museum of Natural History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Museum of Natural History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-the-ny-courts.jpeg
Historical Society of the New York Courts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
Florida Museum of Natural History
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Florida Museum of Natural History company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Historical Society of the New York Courts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Florida Museum of Natural History company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historical Society of the New York Courts company.

In the current year, Florida Museum of Natural History company and Historical Society of the New York Courts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Florida Museum of Natural History company nor Historical Society of the New York Courts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Florida Museum of Natural History company nor Historical Society of the New York Courts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Florida Museum of Natural History company nor Historical Society of the New York Courts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historical Society of the New York Courts company nor Florida Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historical Society of the New York Courts nor Florida Museum of Natural History holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historical Society of the New York Courts company nor Florida Museum of Natural History company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Florida Museum of Natural History company employs more people globally than Historical Society of the New York Courts company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historical Society of the New York Courts nor Florida Museum of Natural History holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historical Society of the New York Courts nor Florida Museum of Natural History holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historical Society of the New York Courts nor Florida Museum of Natural History holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historical Society of the New York Courts nor Florida Museum of Natural History holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historical Society of the New York Courts nor Florida Museum of Natural History holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historical Society of the New York Courts nor Florida Museum of Natural History holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References