Comparison Overview

Historical Society of Long Beach

VS

South Australian Museum

Historical Society of Long Beach

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hslb.org

The Historical Society of Long Beach collects, preserves and presents local history. Through historical collections, exhibits, and programs we connect people to the past and to the place they live. We present an inclusive community narrative and help create greater understanding of our neighborhoods, the city and its place in the larger world. Through our programs, exhibitions, and collections we engage the community in thinking about what makes Long Beach unique. We maintain a gallery, research center, and archive in the Bixby Knolls neighborhood. The HSLB is staffed by a one day a week bookkeeper, a half time membership coordinator, a full time gallery coordinator, an executive director, and many volunteers.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

South Australian Museum

South Australian Museum, Adelaide, SA, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.samuseum.sa.gov.au

The South Australian Museum is recognised as a global leader in Australian Aboriginal heritage and scientific research, based on its research and premier collections. The Museum is also one of the most highly visited cultural institutions in the country. The South Australian Museum is a division of Arts SA within the Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPC). The role of the museum, as prescribed under the South Australian Museum Act, 1976-1985 is: to increase knowledge and understanding of our natural and cultural heritage: to serve the community by acquiring, preserving, interpreting and presenting to the public, material evidence concerning people and nature; and to provide opportunities for study, education and enjoyment.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-long-beach.jpeg
Historical Society of Long Beach
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-australian-museum.jpeg
South Australian Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historical Society of Long Beach
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South Australian Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historical Society of Long Beach in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Australian Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Historical Society of Long Beach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historical Society of Long Beach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South Australian Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Australian Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-long-beach.jpeg
Historical Society of Long Beach
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-australian-museum.jpeg
South Australian Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Historical Society of Long Beach company and South Australian Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, South Australian Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historical Society of Long Beach company.

In the current year, South Australian Museum company and Historical Society of Long Beach company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither South Australian Museum company nor Historical Society of Long Beach company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither South Australian Museum company nor Historical Society of Long Beach company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither South Australian Museum company nor Historical Society of Long Beach company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historical Society of Long Beach company nor South Australian Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historical Society of Long Beach nor South Australian Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historical Society of Long Beach company nor South Australian Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

South Australian Museum company employs more people globally than Historical Society of Long Beach company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historical Society of Long Beach nor South Australian Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historical Society of Long Beach nor South Australian Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historical Society of Long Beach nor South Australian Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historical Society of Long Beach nor South Australian Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historical Society of Long Beach nor South Australian Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historical Society of Long Beach nor South Australian Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References