Comparison Overview

Historical Society of Baltimore County

VS

The Mint Museum

Historical Society of Baltimore County

9811 Van Buren Lane, Cockeysville, MD, 21030, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Historical Society of Baltimore County collects, preserves and interprets more than 360 years of Baltimore County history for the education and enjoyment of present and future generations. We pursue our mission through lectures and workshops, publications, tours, and exhibits, and providing weekly public hours at our research center. Our mission also includes caring for our growing collections, which currently include some 9,000 museum artifacts, 8,000 historic photographs, a 4,000-volume library, 500 historic maps and atlases, and hundreds of archival collections. We partner with like-minded organizations and advocate for a more historically minded, educated and aware society. Founded in 1959, the Society is headquartered in the Almshouse, the third and final such building built by Baltimore County. Dating to 1872, the Almshouse, a beautiful limestone building, was built to accommodate up to 100 poor, indigent, or sick "inmates,"​ as residents were called. It now houses the Society's research center and offices and serves as the character-filled backdrop for most of our public programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Mint Museum

2730 Randolph Rd, Charlotte, NC, 28207, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Beyond the walls that display the art, that separate the collections, that house the lights and descriptions. Beyond the walls between the artist’s intentions and the visitor’s interpretations, between what you see and how you feel, between what was shared and what you’ll share with others. Beyond the walls you’ll find The Mint Museum. An internationally-renowned institution, The Mint Museum is dedicated to collecting, conserving, exhibiting, inspiring, publishing and protecting important works of art and design from all over the global art community. Our commitment to integrity, leadership and innovation intends to encourage not only the understanding of diverse peoples and cultures, but respect for the impact and influence they’ve had on each and every one of us. Through our two locations, Mint Museum Uptown and Mint Museum Randolph, we hope to stimulate the senses, ignite inner passion and compel our visitors to share the things that inspire them with the world. Just as our artists do.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-baltimore-county.jpeg
Historical Society of Baltimore County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-mint-museum.jpeg
The Mint Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historical Society of Baltimore County
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Mint Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historical Society of Baltimore County in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Mint Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Historical Society of Baltimore County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historical Society of Baltimore County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Mint Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Mint Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-baltimore-county.jpeg
Historical Society of Baltimore County
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-mint-museum.jpeg
The Mint Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Historical Society of Baltimore County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Mint Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Mint Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historical Society of Baltimore County company.

In the current year, The Mint Museum company and Historical Society of Baltimore County company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Mint Museum company nor Historical Society of Baltimore County company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Mint Museum company nor Historical Society of Baltimore County company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Mint Museum company nor Historical Society of Baltimore County company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historical Society of Baltimore County company nor The Mint Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historical Society of Baltimore County nor The Mint Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historical Society of Baltimore County company nor The Mint Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Mint Museum company employs more people globally than Historical Society of Baltimore County company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historical Society of Baltimore County nor The Mint Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historical Society of Baltimore County nor The Mint Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historical Society of Baltimore County nor The Mint Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historical Society of Baltimore County nor The Mint Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historical Society of Baltimore County nor The Mint Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historical Society of Baltimore County nor The Mint Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X